|     |     |  About Us   |   Archives   |   Contact Us |

Sign up for Security Debrief Newsletters



Archive for the ‘Maritime & Seaport Security’ Category

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Three

Monday, August 30th, 2010

Bay St. Louis, Waveland and Gulfport, Mississippi

It’s hard to say what the real ground zero of Hurricane Katrina was. For most Americans, they think of the City of New Orleans. They remember the raw and emotionally powerful images of human anguish at the Superdome, the Convention Center, the dramatic rooftop rescues by Coast Guard helicopters, as well as the watery carnage of the Lower 9th Ward.

For as awful as each of those events were, similar catastrophes were experienced by St. Bernard and Jefferson Parishes, as well as Plaquemines and Slidell, LA. While the media certainly covered the earth-shattering events that occurred there, it seems to me that the Gulf Coast of Mississippi seems to have been lost in the coverage. Five years ago, I distinctly remember taking a helicopter trip from New Orleans over to Gulfport, MS. As heartbreaking as it was to hover over broken levees and destruction in southeast Louisiana, it could not compare to what I saw in Mississippi. The only word I used to describe what I saw back then was very simply Hiroshima.  Areas that I had long known from my time doing work at NASA’s Stennis Space Center, long before 9/11 and DHS ever happened, had literally been wiped from the face of Earth. The destruction was beyond catastrophic.

Catastrophic

From the helicopter, the only discernable structures that you could identify were the makeshift tents that emergency personnel and National Guardsmen had put up. In scanning the area, I wanted to see about one piece of property in particular. The more than century-old bed and breakfast along North Beach Blvd in Bay St. Louis that I used to stay at during my extended stays was nothing but shattered debris. After surviving the “big storm” that everyone in Mississippi had never stopped talking about (Hurricane Camille) and countless other storms in its 100-plus years of existence, Miss Ann’s Bed & Breakfast, like thousands of other homes and businesses, finished their lives in destructive ruin.

In returning there today, the only remnants of one of the storied old homes of the South is the old oak that stood at the corner of North Beach Blvd and deMontluzin.

As sad as it was for me to see that, it can’t compare to the lingering heartbreak that residents there have for their lost homes. A longtime friend of mine who lives in Bay St. Louis, Lynn Francis, took me to the place where the first home she had ever purchased once stood. Turning onto Adrienne Court, Lynn seemed to catch herself becoming emotional and quickly apologized.  Telling her to not worry about it, she parked the car and pointed out the car window and said, “This is it.”

Behind the overgrow weeds and shrubbery rested a concrete slap with broken tiles all around it.  While the debris of what had once been her home with its inviting screened porch had long since been removed, the place that had once been a source of warmth and pride for Lynn was now a scar upon the land as well as her heart. For as personal as the visit waStairs to nowheres for her, it is the same for any number of residents. It was not an unusual sight to drive around the area and see brick staircases going up to nowhere because there was no porch or home to connect them to.

Driving closer to the beach, steel beams driven into the ground to anchor the frame of the home against the wrath of Mother Nature were all that remained from any number of places residents of the Mississippi Gulf Coast called home. Another set of stairs, these being spiral, again led to nowhere.

While barren concrete slabs and stairs to nowhere are around for all to see, there is also tremendous rebirth in the area. The once shattered bridge linking Bay St. Louis and Pass Christian now rises high out of the Gulf with artistic brass plaques at points along the walkway telling the story of the area. Stately homes that had been wiped out have been replaced by gleaming structures that would probably send most of the hosts of Home & Garden Television into utter euphoria. Brightly colored condos and beautiful new Catholic churches rise up across from the beach. It was hard not to be inspired at the turn around for the devastated but for every high there seems to be another low around the corner.

Walking along the beach were BP crews looking for oil. With screened shovels, rakes and buckets, nearly a dozen people with bright neon vests and rubber boots and gloves were combing the sand for any remnants of the event that truly ruined the entire region’s summer. What they found appeared to be minuscule, but it was enough to remind me as a visitor of what these people have been through. In speaking with restaurant owners, wait staff and others during my visit, any lingering angst they may have had about Katrina and the area’s recovery was replaced by pure venom for BP.

BP Clean up

No one I spoke to believes any of the promises that BP has made in their television and radio ads. Mississippi residents, like their Louisiana neighbors, fully expect BP to find every possible way of getting out of their responsibilities to the region. They see the oil spill as one more knife into the heart of an economy that depends on fishing and tourism. As to the forthcoming claims process being led by Ken Feinberg, the people I spoke with echoed complaints that I heard in Louisiana about what value a forthcoming damages payment for this year’s losses would be if the oil still in the Gulf prevents people from coming to vacation or eat the fish in their restaurants in future years. If the oil washes up again in future years, residents and business owners fear what they have left will become a waterfront ghost town.

As Jimmy Trapani, the owner of Bay St. Louis’ famous Trapani’s Eatery shared during lunch: “I can handle a storm and move on from that but there’s no moving on when that stuff [the oil] is still out there and people won’t come here to eat in restaurants, go into the water or visit here. What the hell am I supposed to do to prepare this place [his restaurant] for that?”

Trapani's Eatery

Despite his frustrations and those of other MS residents, the citizens of the Magnolia State have proven their abilities to reclaim what was lost as their own. They are one with the coastline and have built smarter and stronger as a result of the lessons learned from the natural fury five years ago. As they look west to their Louisiana neighbors, many take great pride that their recovery seems to be coming along at a better pace, even if they are not receiving the lion’s share of media attention and recognition. Many of them are OK with that, but others fear they will remain overlooked by their noisier next-door neighbors.

Louisiana, and New Orleans in particular, has always made for more compelling media attention than the people of the Magnolia State. In the end though, everyone knows that it’s the end results that matter. The Mississippi Gulf Coast has come back from oblivion before, and the residents there are more than confident in their ability to remain steadfast against lingering threats.  They’ve done so in a fairly quieter fashion for some time now, and that’s OK.

Check out the other pieces in this series.

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part One

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Two

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Four

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Two

Friday, August 27th, 2010

Plaquemines Parish

Other than cruising along a major piece of highway, there are few places that you can drive in America where you can go 50+ miles and not hit a traffic light. Such is the stretch of highway along Louisiana Highway 23, running straight through the center of Plaquemines Parish.  Located just south of New Orleans, Plaquemines is literally a peninsula with the mighty Mississippi River going right through the center of it.

Where most of America has trains, large trucks and airplanes darting in and out of its boundaries, Plaquemines has large cargo ships, super tankers and even cruise ships sailing right down the center of it. It is not at all unusual to be cruising along in your car going 65 and look over and see one of these monstrosities sailing along or stopping alongside the levee walls to wait before they head up or out of the Mississippi.

River

Plaquemines is also a very rural community. With Mississippi River-rich soil, orange and other citrus groves, and grazing cattle dot the landscape. Further adding to the Parish’s landscape are small harbors of fishing boats that venture out into the Gulf for the day’s catch. Despite all of this Mark Twain-like tranquility, it is safe to say that Plaquemines has been through the ringer for the past five years.

When Katrina struck, surges of water in excess of 50 feet crossed over the levees, parking shrimp boats in the center of the Highway 23 and farmer’s fields while cattle and other farm animals were left dangling in the surrounding trees. It also wiped away hundreds of homes and businesses and put the lives of several thousand of the Parish’s residents in scenarios few of us could imagine. It was in many ways an almost Salvador Dali painting of oddball images to comprehend, but they were very real to the region.

For as stark as it was for a number of Plaquemines residents to live in tents with their families for just over six months (until FEMA trailers were put in place and power and water lines were installed), like the area they call home, they were rustic and stuck it out knowing that things could and would get better.

While the communities of tents may be gone, they have been replaced with larger mobile homes, larger travel trailers as well as reinforced steel structures. The few single family homes that you do see are raised up twelve to fifteen feet so as to give them a sense of protection from the water, should it ever arrive again in such an unwanted fashion.

For as bad as Katrina may have “knocked them on their ass,” as one long time resident described to me, “it is BP that has driven the knife into their hearts” and may have given them what several residents believe to be a truly fatal blow.

Not far from the rustic harbors that are home to shrimpers, oystermen and other fisherman are the shorelines and marshes that were stained by the BP oil spill. Tar balls and oil-soaked marshes and beaches became part of the Plaquemines world this year. As a result, part of the professional and personal livelihoods of many in this community – fishing – ceased to exist. To only make matters worse for many of them, the Obama Administration’s moratorium against new oil drilling projects in the Gulf put even more professional livelihoods and their personal economic recovery on hold.

It’s an open debate by many Plaquemines residents as to what is worse: the impact of Katrina, the BP oil spill or the drilling moratorium. One thing they can all agree on is their concern about their future.Boat

Despite its physical limits in land (some areas of the Parish are only a mile wide), Plaquemines is a gold mine when it comes to fishing, hunting and as every Louisiana license plate reminds you, “Sportsman’s Paradise.” It is also home to one of the country’s and world’s largest estuaries, where crab, oysters, ducks, migratory birds, shrimp and more make their homes. The water and land are truly intermingled into the way of life here, and many residents fear the oil-soaked marshes and recently cleaned beaches contain an environmental time bomb just below the surface that will go off in the coming years. Fears are genuine that the ecosystem will be radically altered in such a way that it will destroy not just the nature they dearly love but the way of life that has been with them for generations.

Compounding the fear is the belief, already echoed by new Mayor of New Orleans Mitch Landrieu that BP is “poised to cut and run.” The constant BP media advertisements about “being here to make things right” rings hollow for the vast majority of the people I have met with this week. They’ve heard all the promises before. With Ken Fienberg taking over the BP-funded $20B compensation and clean-up fund and offering the region’s affected residents and businesses six months to take a settlement or go to court, a number of the Parish’s business owners and residents feel like they’ve another potential disaster on their hands.

If they take the settlement money, they give up their rights to sue BP for future damages. The funds they take from BP may or may not help them out, especially if years from now problems with the environment negatively impact the fishing, business operations and way of life they cherish.

marsh

To date, over 28,000 tests have been done by government and independent researchers on the Gulf’s seafood, and the tests declare it safe to eat. The White House, along with the Louisiana Seafood Promotion & Marketing Board, are doing everything they can to assure the American public (and world) of the safety of the Gulf’s natural bounty. Despite those assurances, the perception problem for Gulf seafood harvests is enormous. Those fears will only be compounded if the seafood-loving public turns its back on purchasing Gulf shrimp, oysters, redfish and more.  That will be just another blow to people who have had more than their fair share of pounding over the past five years.

Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, but then again, life in Plaquemines has never been simple or easy.

Check out the other pieces in this series.

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part One

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Three

Five Years Later, Gulf Coast Reflections – Part Four

Hertiage’s Homeland Security Panels – Bucci Speaking on Cyber and Maritime

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Next week, the Heritage Foundation will host “Homeland Security 2010: The Future of Defending the Homeland.” This will be a week-long series of panels aimed at providing a good background for Congressional Staffers new to Homeland Security issues. Heritage did this last year, and it was an excellent event. It should be informative and helpful for the folks who provide the leg work for our Legislative Branch.

This program is diverse. The event begins on Monday, August 23, focusing on maritime security. Two panels will look at this huge area from the civilian and military standpoints.

I will sit on one of the panels and will look at the immense task of achieving maritime security and what has been done so far in pursuit of it. My time as the Deputy Assistant SecDef for Homeland Defense included a great deal of focus on this crucial defense domain.

On Tuesday, the attention will shift to Science and Technology, with two panels looking at the role of fundamental science in security, specifically bioterrorism. Day Three’s panel reaches out to the private sector on its pivotal roll in Homeland Security. It will cover Critical Infrastructure Protection (most of which is privately owned), and the expanding role of the private sector in response since 9/11, Katrina, and the Gulf Oil Spill.

Thursday turns to my favorite – cybersecurity. The actual titles of these panels are intriguing: “Big Brother and the Civilian Network” and “Cyber Nukes: War and Terrorism in the Cyber Domain.” I will be presenting on the latter panel and will look at one of my pet subjects, the growing potential for cyber terrorism once terrorists are enabled by cyber criminal networks.

The five-day program is rounded out with panels looking at the role of state and local government in our response to terrorism and the overall preparedness, response and recovery system.

This outreach to the Staffers is a laudable and worthy task. These (mostly) young citizens are highly educated and very motivated to serve their members in the task of creating an effective legal underpinning for our Homeland Security efforts. By gathering together a diverse group of academics, practitioners, industry types and pundits, Heritage provides an excellent menu of topics from which the staff personnel can choose to augment their knowledge, and with whom they can debate and discuss the issues.

I am very happy to have been asked to participate, and I will be prepared for a great deal of learning and free flowing discourse.  The panels are open to the public and all are welcome. I highly recommend it.

You can RSVP for the panels and find out more by visiting The Heritage Foundation’s website.

Seriously? Congress is still pushing for 100 percent maritime scanning?

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Below is an excerpt of a piece I wrote for US News & World Report about members of Congress, including the Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, calling for Customs and Border Protection to get in gear and meet their crazy congressional mandate of scanning 100 percent of all maritime cargo. They claim TSA did it with air cargo, so why can’t they do it?

Seriously?

Back in 2006, before George W. Bush’s approval ratings dropped through the basement into somewhere around the fourth circle of hell, it made political sense for the congressional Democrats to attack the Republican administration on cargo security. They were fighting to regain control of Congress and had to show that they, too, were capable of protecting the American people from another terrorist attack. They found themselves an effective–if inaccurate–sound bite in accusing the administration of screening a mere 5 percent of cargo coming into the country.

Now that the 100 percent screening mandate for air cargo has come and gone, the usual suspects are turning their attention to maritime scanning. In a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (again) accuses the department of ignoring the will of Congress and not even trying to meet the requirement to scan all cargo coming into the country.

The effort to ignore the ludicrous intent of Congress has been bipartisan, starting with both secretaries under President Bush (Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff) and now Napolitano under President Obama. The reason for trying to ignore the congressional mandate–according to all three secretaries, the thousands and thousands of professional security officers working in DHS, and most independent security experts–is that it is impossible to meet and, more importantly, less effective than the risk-based, layered security model on which the Department of Homeland Security was founded.

But why let most of the security experts in the world get in the way of the will and superior wisdom of Congress?

Read the full story at US News & World Report.

Building a 21st-Century Strategy to Counter Piracy and al Shabaab

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

The piracy question and how to deal with it is huge and is about to become a much larger question in the global supply-chain management continuum. I, like other folks, would like nothing more then to send in the Marines and clean out the nest of pirates. But alas, the days of gunboat diplomacy are of a bygone era.

We now engage our adversaries with not only guns and bullets, but also batteries to run our high-tech systems. Increasingly more important is the new adage, “bring lawyers, guns and money.” Nation building will take a great deal of finesse and understanding, as well as forceful measures.

One of these first opening salvos has been fired by the White House, though it seems to have been ignored by the business community with an interest in these matters. The Presidential Executive Order (EO), issued in April 2010, prevents U.S. citizens/entities from making payments to certain named individuals. It also has the potential to prevent any payments to individuals or groups involved in or supporting piracy in Somalia.

The regulatory guidelines for implementing this EO are yet to be promulgated, but given the recent Shabaab attack in Kampala, Uganda, in which at least one U.S. citizen was killed (a crime being investigated by the FBI), one can reasonably expect the enforcement issue of the EO to be forthcoming.

Shabaab is known to have sworn allegiance to bin Laden and Qaeda, and this Shabaab attack will clearly articulate the connections between piracy ransoms, Shabaab and the broader global war on terror. The probable outcome, in my opinion, will be the Lloyds, Joint Hull & Joint War Committees declaring that they will no longer underwrite insurance for kidnap and ransom in this arena. And now the lawyers and money come to the forefront.

In order to operate the critical sea lanes in the Gulf of Aden and the Somali environs, government resources from concerned nations will need to be deployed. The United States may not be the principal user of these lanes, but we are likely one of the principal end-users of the output from the associated supply chain. For this reason, it is important that we gain understanding and proactively look for how we engage the piracy issue. At least 85 percent of our critical infrastructure is privately held, and therein lays the bulk of the responsibility for defending those nodes. Building coalitions across industry and national borders, sharing information and supporting combined military action when needed will be a key effort to meeting the threat.

In one of his first acts of president, Thomas Jefferson met the challenge of pirates. Now, 200 years later, we face a similar situation, which will indeed need lawyers, guns and money. It will also take intelligence, technology and collaboration.

The New Face of Aviation Security?

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

The hunt for someone to lead the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) began in 2009, but it wasn’t until June this year that the Senate confirmed John Pistole as administrator. Pistole was the third nominee for the job, after two earlier hopefuls pulled out (see Southers and Harding). Security Debrief followed the confirmation process every step of the way and found the latest development in this week’s Air Cargo Week.

If you visit TSA’s website, you’ll find Pistole’s photo, which looks like this:

John Pistole

In Air Cargo Week’s Arrivals & Departures section, there is a note on Pistole’s confirmation (first bullet, right column). But the photo referenced is clearly not John Pistole.

Arrivals&Departures, Air Cargo Week, 7/19

Who is this man? Nominee #4? A hero cargo pilot? The publisher’s cousin?

It’s Chris Battle, Security Debrief’s founder and editor.

That’s some good PR.

Learning the Hard Way from British Petroleum’s Costly Mistakes

Friday, June 11th, 2010

It has been over a month since the tragic Deepwater Horizon explosion, and at this writing, oil continues to pour into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and onto adjacent land and marsh areas. Although a number of investigations have begun to identify the cause of this accident, in the end, they will find that prospectors, driven by an oil rush mentality, took their quest for oil to new depths where they did not have the technology to operate safely.

Several years ago, while on active duty in the Coast Guard, I visited a large offshore oil rig to examine their operation. This rig cost over $1 billion dollars to build and was connected to multiple wells over one mile below by a complex piping system. The rig had a sophisticated dynamic positioning system that would keep it in place even in hurricane conditions, a flexible piping system to allow the rig to move within an operating circle, and an automatic shutoff system called a blowout preventer that would automatically stop the flow of oil should all of these other systems fail.

Despite the large capital investment in this rig and wells, no oil was flowing during my visit. The oil company had found that the piping system it had installed between the rig and wells in these new untried depths was inadequate to withstand the temperatures and pressures on the seafloor. Over the following year they were going to replace all of the piping to make certain it could safely operate in this new and challenging environment. The oil company was willing to have this rig sit idle and take large losses as they learned how to take oil from such great depths.

Most of the easy oil from existing lease areas in the Gulf has been exploited. The large oil reserves in the Gulf now reside in deep water areas. Plans are to have a few handfuls of large, deep water rigs collect oil from multiple deep wells on the seafloor and eventually produce nearly 80 percent of all oil taken from the Gulf. Because the Coast Guard has responsibility for the safety and security (not the drilling operation) of these rigs, our concern at that time was how we would protect these attractive terrorist targets from attack. Unfortunately, it was a tragic accident that produced the same net effect as a terrorist attack.

It is clear that the oil companies worked diligently to produce technologies that could bring oil from deep wells to the surface. It is also clear that they did not develop, on a parallel track, the multi-layered technologies needed to stop and respond to an emergency on the deep ocean sea floor. That is why we see them trying new technologies to stop the flow of oil and gas as millions of gallons of oil gush into the water column. They are learning as they go and at great expense to the environment and people of the Gulf. It is like trying to repack your parachute while in a freefall.

It is now up to the federal government to ensure this doesn’t happen again. Before deep water drilling recommences, the oil companies should demonstrate that they have reliable technologies in place to prevent well blowouts at great depths and layered fail safe systems in place that can respond should the prevention systems fail. We are learning this lesson the hard way.

The Mavi Marmara and the Exodus 1947: A Historical Parallel?

Monday, June 7th, 2010

On July 11, 1947, a ship carrying more than 4,000 Jews sailed from the south of France and headed to Palestine. The Zionist movement endeavoring to create the State of Israel as a home for the Jews sought to “break the embargo imposed by Great Britain on immigration to Palestine.”

On July 18, British naval forces intercepted the ship and boarded it in international waters off the coast of Palestine. A clash ensued with the immigrants on board resulting in three deaths with more than 30 wounded. Britain faced worldwide condemnation for having used excessive force in dealing with the ship’s passengers.

The ship’s name was Exodus 1947, and it became the symbol of Jewish Aliya Bet. The international outrage forced the British to change their policy and in September 1947, the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into two states, one Arab and one Jewish. With the departure of the last contingent of British forces from Palestine on May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the State of Israel.

On May 30, 2010, more than 500 Palestinian activists and sympathizers sailed from Turkey aboard the Mavi Marmara ship as part of the “Free Gaza Flotilla” in an effort to “break the siege imposed by Israel on Gaza.”

On May 31, the Israeli Navy intercepted the ship, which was then boarded by Israeli commandoes. The clash that ensued resulted in the death of more than a dozen activists and approximately thirty wounded. Israel is facing worldwide condemnation for having used excessive force, and Palestinians and their supporters are vowing to continue the flotilla effort until the Gaza siege is lifted.

Will the Mavi Marmara end up having the same historical significance to Palestinians as did the Exodus 1947 for Jews? Only time will tell.

Cultural intelligence matters.

The Mavi Marmara and the Exodus 1947: A Historical Parallel?

On July 11, 1947, a ship carrying more than 4,000 Jews sailed from the south of France and headed to Palestine. The Zionist movement endeavoring to create the State of Israel as a home for the Jews sought to “break the embargo imposed by Great Britain on immigration to Palestine.”

On July 18, British naval forces intercepted the ship and boarded it in international waters off the coast of Palestine. A clash ensued with the immigrants on board resulting in three deaths with more than 30 wounded. Britain faced worldwide condemnation for having used excessive force in dealing with the ship’s passengers.

The ship’s name was Exodus 1947, and it became the symbol of Jewish Aliya Bet. The international outrage forced the British to change their policy and in September 1947, the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into two states, one Arab and one Jewish. With the departure of the last contingent of British forces from Palestine on May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the State of Israel.

On May 30, 2010, more than 500 Palestinian activists and sympathizers sailed from Turkey aboard the Mavi Marmara ship as part of the “Free Gaza Flotilla” in an effort to “break the siege imposed by Israel on Gaza.”

On May 31, the Israeli Navy intercepted the ship, which was then boarded by Israeli commandoes. The clash that ensued resulted in the death of more than a dozen activists and approximately thirty wounded. Israel is facing worldwide condemnation for having used excessive force, and Palestinians and their supporters are vowing to continue the flotilla effort until the Gaza siege is lifted.

Will the Mavi Marmara end up having the same historical significance to Palestinians as did the Exodus 1947 for Jews? Only time will tell.

Cultural intelligence matters.

Unprecedented Service – Thad Allen’s Almost Retirement

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

On Tuesday, a man much of America recognizes for his leadership following the occurrence of a “bad day” will relinquish his command of one of our country’s oldest branches of federal service, the U.S. Coast Guard. Having served the past four years as Commandant, Thad Allen has become one of those unique, iconic American figures that when you see him or mention his name, you almost immediately think of words, “trust,” “competent” and “leader.”

He is, for lack of a better description, a Walter Cronkite type – one of the most trusted people in America – a man that citizens could turn to and hear straight facts, be they good or bad, with no BS or political showmanship. It gave you comfort to see and hear him because you knew that he was on the job to make the situation right.

In a country gripped by bi-partisan, anti-incumbency fever, where career seniority is seen as a liability and not an asset, his departure as Commandant couldn’t happen at a more challenging moment. For those who are privileged to know him and have worked for him (as I did in 2005 during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita), his retirement is certainly the culmination of a distinguished 30-year career. He has truly earned whatever break he and his family want to have from constant moves, late night briefings, long deployments, Congressional hearings and rubber chicken dinners. As difficult as all of those things may have been for him and his family, Allen’s career has been about two things: leadership and service to others.

Because of recent events, we know just a few of the public metrics of those two attributes, most notably his service as lead for the Federal response following Hurricane Katrina. With hundreds dead, thousands displaced, an American city in ruin, and a flop of a Federal response dropped in his lap, if there was ever a no-win situation for a person to step into, it was Katrina. There truly was no place to go but up, but it took leadership to point the correct direction and take the first step. It was Allen who began the trek out of the muck.

As someone who was there in Louisiana at the time, I can say without hesitation that when he took over, there was a literal sea change in how the response unfolded. In respecting the various jurisdictions of all of the federal, state, local and private sector players, Allen empowered his people to take action to make change happen and happen quickly. It was for those reasons that then-President Bush and DHS Secretary Chertoff tapped him to respond to one of our nation’s darkest days. It is for those exact same reasons that President Obama and DHS Secretary Napolitano have asked him to serve as the National Incident Commander in dealing with the on-going oil spill in the Gulf – an unprecedented service that he will continue to fulfill even after his tenure as Commandant ends on Tuesday.

Allen’s career in the Coast Guard is almost unparalleled given the increased public recognition that it brought for him personally and to his service branch. Most Americans can recognize the country’s senior military leadership from news photos and television coverage, but for generations of Americans, the U.S. Coast Guard was a service not in prominent public view. To many Americans, the Coast Guard was synonymous with the guys who patrolled the rivers and lakes and made sure everyone behaved themselves with their boats. As unfortunate as the circumstances were, the Coast Guard’s unrecognized leadership and service to others caught the full attention of the country as the responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita unfolded.

Helicopter airlifts, boat patrols and other rescues were the bright spots in bleak days. Fate happened to put Thad Allen in the center of it all. From that point forward, Allen’s unsought celebrity brought recognition to him and to the men and women with whom he served; something that was long overdue for a service that has been in operation from this country’s beginning. The unique “gift” of public recognition also provided Allen the political capital to say things that needed to be said (especially during budget hearings) and to put in place things that needed to be there to deal with twenty-first century threats (e.g. Deployable Operations Group, etc.).

Allen is not without his critics, but few can deny his elevation as Commandant and recognition of his service branch are due to a unique military culture that insists that public, private and military sectors work together to achieve mission success. While DHS is made of many distinguished and accomplished parts, few of them have anything like the culture of the Coast Guard that trains its personnel from Day One to adapt and respond to events and processes, rather then be subject to processes and bureaucratic programming.

Such are the hallmarks of a career founded in leadership and service to others. They just don’t end when a final salute is given and a command change is complete. Instead, they show up on Wednesday to deal with on-going bad days and to make miserable situations right. Thad Allen’s career could not end any other way.

On Tuesday, a man much of America recognizes for his leadership following the occurrence of a “bad day” will relinquish his command of one of our country’s oldest branches of federal service, the U.S. Coast Guard. Having served the past four years as Commandant, Thad Allen has become one of those unique, iconic American figures that when you see him or mention his name, you almost immediately think of words, “trust,” “competent” and “leader.”

Napolitano Resigns? Pelosi Raids ICE Headquarters? Really?

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Think you’ve heard it all? We beg to differ. For this special April Fools edition, we’ve collected recent news reports that the rest of the media somehow missed.

Napolitano Resigns: Favors Federal Penitentiary Over Congressional Hearings

Janet Napolitano resigned this morning as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. In a letter to President Obama, Napolitano cited on-going fatigue and frustration with managing one of the most complex government operations in the world. In her letter, an obviously agitated Napolitano scolded the President admonishing him, “Where’s the help you promised me?  Have you seen my workplace accommodations? What the hell!?”

As shocking as her unanticipated resignation is, it does not compare with the selection of her replacement. In an unprecedented leadership exchange facilitated by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Napolitano will be replaced by former NYPD Commissioner and one-time DHS Secretary nominee, Bernie Kerik. Napolitano in turn will serve the 4-year prison sentence that the recently convicted former police commissioner was due to start serving on May 17.

Security Debrief has learned that the highly unusual leadership swap was Napolitano’s idea. In a classified memo to her senior staff, obtained exclusively by Security Debrief, the former Arizona governor felt it would be more punishing to submit Kerik to her relentless schedule, appearing before more than eighty different Congressional committees, than for him to spend his time lifting weights in the prison gym yard.

In agreeing to switch places with Kerik in a federal penitentiary, Napolitano stated that “four years in prison would be a vacation compared to going to one more committee hearing answering the same stupid questions from every single member of Congress claiming jurisdiction over my department.”

No comment was immediately available from the Justice Department, the White House or Bernie Kerik on these breaking developments.

Upon her selection by President Obama in late 2008, Napolitano was heralded as a homeland security innovator familiar with security operations and border and immigration issues. Of late though, the pressure of one of the most demanding jobs in America became too much for her as she recently injured her foot kicking a junior member of DHS’ Legislative Affairs staff through a wall. The staffer had come to her office to deliver another binder of congressional hearing prep materials.

A press conference by DHS is anticipated some time later today.

——————————————————————————————————————–

FEMA’s Fugate on Leave, Joins Reality TV Cast

In a shocking news conference at his downtown Washington headquarters, FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate announced he was taking a three-month leave of absence to join the cast of the legendary reality show Survivor. Effective June 1, the start of Hurricane Season, Fugate will depart Washington for a coral reef island off the coast of Australia to compete for a $1,000,000 prize and subsequent invites to participate in lesser-known dance contest reality shows.

Joining him will be Edgar, an Eskimo spear fisherman; Sarah, an OMB Examiner; Stan, a garbage man from Milwaukee; Jimmy, a guy from somewhere in Arkansas; a butcher, baker and a candlestick maker to be named later and a guy name McGyver.

Before a shocked workforce, Fugate thundered, “It’s time to show the world how preparedness is really done. No more whiners and excuse-mongers who say they can’t do it because I’m going to show you how!”

Mark Burnett, Creator and Executive Producer of the hit CBS reality show, attended Fugate’s announcement and told reporters afterwards that the FEMA Administrator and his Survivor competitors would be taken from an airstrip in Guam in early June, joined together by one fastening belt and parachute and dropped out of the plane at 10,000 feet over the coral reef island.

In agreeing to join the cast, Fugate required that his appearance contract provide for 72 hours worth of water, food and batteries (with his name written in permanent marker on each item), as well as the entire ABBA and .38 Special music catalogue, all waiting for him when he parachutes in.

“Our audience has never seen anything like what Craig is going to give them this upcoming season,” offered Burnett before leaving for the airport.

In granting him permission for this unprecedented leave, DHS Secretary Napolitano advised Fugate: “Keep your clothes on.”

——————————————————————————————————————–

Boeing Mystified over SBInet – Turns out, Not an Actual Net

On Wednesday, Boeing executives and engineers gathered in southern Arizona along the U.S.-Mexico border to discuss why one of the world’s largest aerospace companies was unable to achieve a high-tech answer to America’s border woes, despite billions of dollars in funding. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s recent redirection of funding for SBInet – the project to build a technology-based detection line along the southern U.S. border – left Boeing leaders wondering, “Where did we go wrong?”

After the Secretary’s decision, Jim Albaugh, president and CEO of Boeing Integrated Defense Systems, demanded a personal demonstration of Boeing’s product. It took a team of six engineers to arrange the delicate technology. Removing a heavy tarp, the six each took hold of the advanced border solution – a giant fishing net.

“You hold one end like this,” said Walter Johnson, engineer, as he walked away from his peers. “And the others hold the other end, and you just stretch it out.”

“Seems reasonable,” said Albaugh. “But it’s a little small. Aren’t there 10,000 miles of border?”

“Yes, sir,” said Johnson. “We’re still making the net. This is only the prototype.”

During the demonstration, a family of soon-to-be-illegal-immigrants was spotted in the distance.

“Quick, quick, while the cameras are on, ” whispered Albaugh. “Napolitano doesn’t know what she’s talking about. Let’s test it!”

Engineers pulled the net as wide as they could, but despite the effort, the family changed directions and circumvented the Boeing crew by dozens of feet.

“Definitely needs to be longer,” said Albaugh.

When asked about his company’s seeming failure to achieve project goals, Boeing Chairman, President and CEO James McNerney said: “We build airplanes. What the f**k do we know about fences and cameras?”

——————————————————————————————————————–

White House Outsources Personnel Shop to Washington Post

Earlier today, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs announced that effective close of business the Office of White House Personnel would be closed with all of its functions outsourced to the Washington Post.

Hailing the move as an extraordinary cost savings and efficiency measure, Gibbs related that the move would allow all of its prospective nominees and personnel selections to be better vetted than a Katie Couric broadcasted colonoscopy.

Joined at the podium by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Gibbs explained that since the Post had already torpedoed two of the administration’s nominees for TSA Administrator as well as uncovered countless embarrassing facts about other Obama personnel and previous White House officials, the move made sense from an economical and operational perspective.

Added Emanuel, “Let’s be f****** clear:  I’m sick and g******** tired of picking up the paper and reading something about some bastard we’ve nominated that I should have f****** known to begin with. What the f***!  If our d***head people can’t do this job, I figured let’s save some poor sonofab**** his job over at that miserable ‘organ‘ called the Washington Post, which is s**tcanning people left and right anyway. It’s either that, or we start sending around a lot of dead f***** fish in this town.”

Under the new personnel screening construct, prospective Obama appointees and Senate-confirmed nominees will now be forced to disclose all remotely possible embarrassing or revealing information, dating back to childhood, while new Personnel Chief, the Post’s Robert O’Harrow, goes through all of their financial holdings, school transcripts and NCAA brackets to determine fitness for office.

Known as “the Terminator” to his Post colleagues (and the “Effing Terminator” to Emanuel), for asking questions that sink nominees, O’Harrow merely made his fist into a gun and simulated firing when asked if he was excited about his new position.

——————————————————————————————————————–

Pornographers Submit FOIA, Looking for “Best of Airport Scanners”

Pornography publishing pioneers Bob Guccione and Larry Flynt have joined legal forces and submitted a nationwide FOIA request to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) seeking access to millions of digital images taken by full body scanners at the nation’s airports.

Citing a desire to “see what undiscovered talents and assets might be out there,” Hustler publisher Flynt, once again wearing only an American flag, said it would only be natural for him to undertake such an action.

“I’ve fought my way all the way to the Supreme Court in the past to show the country what’s out there,” he said. “I’ve taken on the U.S. Congress during impeachment to show the country what really goes on behind closed doors in the halls of power. Hubba Hubba, you know? And now it’s time to see what’s going on over there at the TSA.”

In partnering with his pornography publishing rival, Penthouse’s Guccione, Flynt expressed satisfaction that despite legal protests by DHS and the Justice Department, they would prevail with their case.

Ever since the December 25 attempt to blow up a Detroit bound airliner, calls for increased passenger screening measures have grown immeasurably. In response, TSA sped up the deployment of full body scanning machines to enable Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) to see concealed weapons beneath passengers’ clothing. While enhancing the overall security operations at the country’s airports, TSOs also get to see digital images of buck-naked air travelers.

“When I heard about this technology, I just knew it was for me,” offered Guccione. “For years, I’ve looked for ways to find more attractive women for my readers to enjoy, and the fact that the government is providing it for free makes it all the better. I understand Hugh Hefner is even trying to get one for the Playboy Mansion.”

Acting TSA Administrator Gale Rossides was not amused by the FOIA submission.

“For months, I have told every Member of Congress, media outlet, reporter, civil liberties group and Kiwanis Club — anybody who would listen — that these digital images are not stored or archived in any way. They’re not even seen by the guy standing there at the machine.” said Rossides. “If I have to prove it, I’ll go through one of the machines myself on national television.”

Rossides offer was immediately rejected by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, the entire House Homeland Security Committee on a unanimous bipartisan vote, and President Obama, who threatened to issue an executive order prohibiting Rossides from going through with her threat. Flynt’s response was equally immediate: “Get the f*** out of here.”

After learning of an FOIA request from the two notorious pornography champions, Security Debrief reached out to three different TSOs who work with the body imagers at Dulles International in Virginia, Los Angeles International Airport in California, and Morgantown Regional Airport in West Virginia.

Citing confidentiality, the names of these TSOs have been changed to protect them from reprisals from their respective wives and girlfriends.

“Jimmy” who has worked at Dulles for nearly three years said, “It’s not all its cracked up to be.  You try looking at pictures of naked grandmas coming home from Vegas with fresh tattoos for six hours a day. I’m in therapy.”

Jimmy offered that he hoped to quit his job soon to become an advisor to First Lady Michelle Obama’s campaign against obesity.

At LAX, “Oscar,” who has been a TSO since 2006, observed that silicone and collagen do show up separately on the images. “At first I thought these gals were trying to sneak explosive fluids onboard, but it was nothing like that. The secondary inspection though was pretty cool as I’m a pat-down type, and I do my job thoroughly.”

“Jethro” joined TSA at Morgantown Regional Airport in early 2010. Explaining that he was inspired to fight guys who light their underpants on fire and meet “hot women,” he expressed satisfaction with all he’s seen to date.

“You would not believe what people can pierce man… I mean seriously put a nail through.  It’s wicked.”

——————————————————————————————————————–

Kings Dominion Unveils New Water Slide: “The Cheney”

Kings Dominion, the themed-amusement park located outside Richmond, Virginia, announced the opening of its newest attraction to its WaterWorks park. Called “the Cheney,” riders will be strapped to a fiberglass board with a bag over their heads, shoved backwards into a water flowing tube and propelled through 1,200 feet of winding pipe, all the while with a former CIA contractor shouting obscenities in their faces.

On hand for the announcement, the former U.S. Vice President said he was “humbled” by the unique honor.

“Presidents get libraries and monuments named after them, but this is something different,” said the former Vice President. “It’s something the whole family can enjoy and remember. I couldn’t be more pleased to have this recognition.”

Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, a prominent critic of the Bush Administration’s terrorism practices, also attended the unveiling, Noting Leahy’s presence, Cheney flashed a thumbs-up and told the senator to “go f*** yourself.”

Kings Dominion executives at the announcement offered that the Vice President’s spirited defense of waterboarding “inspired us in ways we could have never imagined.”

In a prepared statement, Kings Dominion Executive Vice President for Spastic Thrills, I. M. Hurling said, “After we got a hold of the declassified handbook on enhanced interrogation techniques, we knew we had to be on the cutting edge for our customers.”

The water ride’s designers explained that they had spent months perfecting the design and sequencing to ensure that each rider got the full “swooshing” effect without encountering any of the embarrassing swimsuit wedgies that happen with other water rides.

Hurling also retained Bush-Cheney era attorney John Yoo to draft a legal brief protecting the water park from any potential lawsuits.

“Waterboarding wasn’t torture then, and it’s not now,” noted Yoo. “For love the god, it’s entertainment.”

——————————————————————————————————————–

Pelosi Raids Immigration Offices

Emboldened by the strong-arm tactics used to cram healthcare legislation through Congress, Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday led a gang of elderly members of Congress and youthful aides on a raid of the headquarters for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

During a perp walk of the entire ICE leadership, Pelosi held an impromptu news conference announcing, “Immigration agents will no longer terrorize our communities, arresting and deporting innocent illegal immigrants. Now we will terrorize them – bring on comprehensive immigration reform!” It is unclear why the Speaker used air quotes whenever she said “comprehensive immigration reform.”

As a frustrated Assistant Secretary John Morton passed in the perp line, he protested that Pelosi did not have the legal authority to arrest federal agents.

“She’s got all the authority she needs, you little Nazi,” shouted an adrenaline-laced Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois. “She’s the freaking Speaker of the House, and the Daily Kos loves her.”

Gutierrez is best remembered for his assertion in 2008 that the Bush Administration had put the “Gestapo agents at Homeland Security” in charge. It was never entirely clear, however, what they had been put in charge of.

The raid was executed in the early morning hours, just before daylight but right after the early political talk show circuits. Pandemonium broke out through the halls of ICE as congressmen wielding dangerously thick stacks of legislation broke into the offices of ICE agents shouting “Against the wall!” and “On your face!” – phrases taught to them by the Capitol Hill Police, according to sources who wished to remain anonymous due to a fear and loathing of Capitol Hill in general. The confusion during the raid was exacerbated by some of the more elderly House members, separated from their aides, who shouted “Get on my face” and “Let’s build a wall – it won’t cost a dime!”

Tensions nearly erupted into lethal violence in ICE’s Office of Investigations when a Mexican standoff occurred between a team of special agents hiding under their desks with ankle-strapped glocks and a threatening mob of legislative assistants pointing finely sharpened subpoenas.

In a display of calm leadership, Chief of Operations Alonzo Pena urged his agents to holster their weapons, asserting that nobody would get hurt and that there were laws protecting them from this kind of congressional over-reach. To which the legislative aides laughed and suggested that Pena contact Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and ask him about that. “And be sure to mention Reconciliation.”

Outside at her news conference, Pelosi played a repeating loop of her comments videotaped at a town hall declaring that ICE agents were un-American for enforcing the laws passed by Congress. “What kind of world would we live in if everybody took the laws we passed seriously?” she asked the crowd of reporters, most of whom nodded judiciously.

“That’s why we are going to prosecute these hatemongers s in the New York City courthouse, the exact same spot where 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed was to be prosecuted.”

Within the hour, Attorney General Eric Holder issued a statement stating that the trials of ICE agents would not be held in New York due to local concerns that such a concentrated collection of members of Congress would result in security concerns, over-regulation and massive new taxes.

As a result, the determined Speaker is currently considering legislation that would exchange ICE agents (or “un-American bullies,” as they are referred to in the language of her bill) with the terrorists in custody on Guantanamo Bay.

——————————————————————————————————————–

EAGLE II Gets New Name, Other Changes Expected

In response to two days of less-than-complimentary comments from vendors attending EAGLE II Industry Day presentations, DHS has decided to change the name of the procurement to “JACK BAUER I” (Justifying Asinine Contracts Knowing Better And Unique Expertise Requires Intelligence)

“We were inspired by the recent re-branding of Comcast Cable to Xfinity and Blackwater to Xe,” said Soraya Correa, DHS Director of the Office of Procurement Operations. “Their reputation was almost as bad as ours, and by a simple name change Xfinity, as one example, has been able to fool most of their customers into believing they are getting something cool. Plus, we like the image 24’s Jack Bauer conveys on camera,” Correa explained.

After subjecting small business leaders and “unrestricted” large businesses to two days of obfuscation and contracting double-speak, DHS officials concluded that too many people actually understood the purpose of the EAGLE II concept, thereby necessitating a change in direction.

Kevin Boshears, DHS’ Director of Small and Disadvantaged Utilization, admitted that the Industry Day presentations had not “disadvantaged” a sufficient number of potential vendors and that a change of public perception was required.

“We decided that the name ‘EAGLE II’ was insufficiently robust, and it was easier to change the name acronym than to make substantive changes in the procurement,” Boshears said.

Citing FAR clauses that caused eyes to glaze over at an unprecedented rate, Boshears claimed that a 40 percent Small Business requirement and 6 percent Veteran Owned Small Business mandate would resolve conflicts between DHS and SBA goals in meeting statistical mandates. Audience members, including three sleep apnea-disabled individuals, sat in stunned silence while Boshears spoke.

Contacted after the Industry Day conferences, recently appointed DHS Under Secretary for Management Rafael Borras boasted that the EAGLE II name change would be indicative of the type of bold action he planned to take in his new position.

“If Comcast and Blackwater can divert public attention from their problems by coming up with a fancy new name, DHS has much to gain by changing the names of our questionable programs,” Borras said.

Although Borras would not confirm them, rumors abound throughout DHS hallways that other program name changes are being considered.

Current speculation is that SBInet will be renamed “LALA” (Look, Another Lost Alien); EINSTEIN II will be called “ALBERT” (Awfully Large Businesses Exhaust Routine Technologies); and E-VERIFY will be called “SKIPPY” (no idea what this stands for, but it sounds nice.)

Changes are still subject to OMB approval and publication in the Federal Register.

——————————————————————————————————————–

Biden Laments, “Why is his longer?”

As the White House continues to deal with the fall-out from the recent off-color comments by Vice President Joe Biden at the signing of the Health Care legislation, it is now dealing with another embarrassing crisis from the one-time senior U.S. Senator from Delaware.

In reviewing recent video footage of a pre-Easter Egg Roll dress rehearsal, a visibly frustrated Biden is seen yelling towards his Secret Service detail, “Why is his longer? I’m a big f***ing deal!” while gesturing towards the motorcade of President Obama which had just left the White House complex for a speech at the Reagan Building.

The Vice President’s wife, Dr. Jill Biden, is also seen on the video trying to console the angered Vice President, telling him that “size isn’t everything.”

In interviews with at least three different senior Administration officials, Security Debrief has learned that the Vice President has expressed his displeasure at the length of his motorcade when compared to that of the President’s. Of particular annoyance is the fact that the President has an ambulance as part of his motorcade, as well as two more black Suburbans and two buses for the press pool.

The Vice President’s displeasure increased further following the late March visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he learned that his motorcade was also given an ambulance, two additional Suburbans and a juicer.

In seeking to address the Vice President’s motorcade size concerns, Administration officials shared that the Secret Service was adding five new additional Bose sub-woofer sirens designed by Kanye West that would announce at high decibel levels in a continuous loop: “Head’s up, big effing deal coming through.”

Getting Smart about the Smart Grid

Monday, January 18th, 2010

By Justin Hienz
Adfero Group

Perhaps America’s most critical infrastructure is its national electrical grid. It has served us well to this point, supporting all our grandiose and astounding technological innovations. But the grid is getting old, and it doesn’t keep up with our innovations (and electronic appetites) as well as it should. So, we’re upgrading – to a Smart Grid.

Smart Grid, you say? Smart indeed, and we need it. While the national power system ages, we continue to charge into the technological future – and this requires power – lots of it. Our increasing power needs must be delivered when and where we want it with the flip of a switch. Moreover, we need our power intake to be consistent, resilient and less vulnerable to interruptions, be they natural or human-caused.

Here’s why. When the power goes out, we lose billions with a B – specifically, even with the power system 99.97 percent reliable, power outages cost $150 billion a year. What’s worse, if the power is out, we’re less able to protect our infrastructure and population, particularly as we become more reliant on computer systems and surveillance technologies. And if even one person has to miss the Real Housewives of Orange County, by God that’s an infringement on our liberty! Whatever we want, whenever we want it. That’s capitalism to a T.

The Smart Grid will help make this possible. It decentralizes power generation, increases transmission and allows the grid to interact with “smart” appliances based on consumer desires – smart, because advanced computer systems will better distribute power based on pre-determined and perceived needs. This makes it cheaper, more efficient and less likely to go on the fritz.

The grid also incorporates alternative fuel sources, such as wind and solar energy. Ah, green. Mother Nature will be pleased. Terrorists will not be, as decentralized production and distribution makes it much harder for attacks to create any significant or lasting impact.

And so the other shoe drops: What does the Smart Grid have to do with homeland security?

Everything.

I don’t claim to be an expert on the Smart Grid, but after reading much of what information is openly available, it is clear that the Grid touches on every aspect of homeland security. That’s intuitive because technology has become a central aspect of our national security. Yet, despite this, there is not the kind of widespread discussion on how to improve Smart Grid security – the kind we need if we’re going to keep the Grid safe.

We must be constantly aware that the United States without power is like a battleship without fuel. The guns might work, but for the most part, we’re dead in the water. Aviation and maritime security are important but impossible without constant, secure power – no screening technologies, no lights, no alarms. Supply chain security is essential to our continued prosperity – but once again, no power, no chain. Cyber security and electronic surveillance technology is a no-brainer, but what about waste management, clean water, heating and air conditioning, and food refrigeration? Homeland security isn’t only about a war on terror. There are many elements to our critical infrastructure that rely on a constant supply of power, and if the Smart Grid isn’t tough enough to withstand all threats, we’re in for a world of hurt.

The time to improve Smart Grid security is now, while we are developing it. The information is readily available (some would say too available, as al Qaeda and other American enemies use open-source information to do us harm). So before the doors of information close, and only those with clearance can keep up with the rapid developments, let’s focus our collective efforts on digesting the wealth of information available. Let’s make Smart Grid debates and improvements as key an element of our homeland security analysis as any other (e.g., aviation security). To be sure, there are expert voices sounding off, but in my opinion, given the importance of the Smart Grid, there are not nearly enough.

This isn’t some future plan getting dusty in the back room. It’s happening right now. Parts of the grid have already been built and are operating in California. President Obama pushed the development full-steam ahead with $4.5 billion from the 2009 economic stimulus money dedicated specifically to fast track Smart Grid technology development. Piece by piece, the Smart Grid is coming together. It deserves more expert attention. Otherwise, lights out.

Justin Hienz is a Senior Account Executive at Adfero Group, working with the firm’s Homeland Security practice. He is also assistant editor of Security Debrief.

Arctic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

Security Debrief contributor Scott Borgerson published “Arctic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming” last year in the prestigious foreign policy journal Foreign Affairs. With all of the focus on global warming currently coming out of Copenhagen, we thought it might be worth bringing Scott’s thoughts to your attention again.

Thanks to global warming, the Arctic icecap is rapidly melting, opening up access to massive natural resources and creating shipping shortcuts that could save billions of dollars a year. But there are currently no clear rules governing this economically and strategically vital region. Unless Washington leads the way toward a multilateral diplomatic solution, the Arctic could descend into armed conflict.

The Elephant in the Room: Scrapping 100 Percent Scanning

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

By Jena Baker McNeill
Homeland Security Policy Analyst at The Heritage Foundation

Today, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano testified before the Senate Commerce Committee on the topic of transportation security. What she said about cargo security was something lots of folks in the homeland security community have been saying for the past two years. There are a number of serious challenges that stand in the way of the 100 percent scanning mandate.

The private sector has known this for a while. These innovators understand that you can’t be perfect (i.e., scan 100 percent of cargo) without the right technology. And Napolitano backed them up in today’s hearing emphasizing a distinct lack of technology to “effectively and automatically detect suspicious anomalies within cargo containers that should trigger additional inspection.”

But the private sector isn’t alone. Intelligence community members repeatedly downplayed the likelihood of the commonly touted “nuke in a box” scenario—the scenario widely touted as the reason this mandate was needed. Napolitano also backs up this assertion, stating “the likelihood of an attack is difficult to determine…there is little evidence our adversaries have made a significant advancement toward that goal.”

Select members of Congress, like Senators Collins and Lieberman, have been saying it. Collins has rightly recognized that making Americans believe that 100 percent of cargo will be scanned without the right technology to ensure this will happen “is misguided and provides a false sense of security.”

Napolitano also emphasizes that this mandate could be a killer for an ailing economy and is likely to cost as much as $8 million per shipping lane. Congress must assume the American taxpayer or the private sector will incur these costs—a pill that is quite difficult to swallow.

The Secretary should be applauded for her leadership on the matter and her recognition that when it comes to regulatory schemes, an accurate idea of the risk the country faces must be at the crux of the debate. But what she didn’t say is something more fundamental. This mandate was a bad idea to start with. We don’t need more timelines, money, extensions or mandates to make this happen. We need to rethink the approach altogether. There is a lot of good, risk-based stuff happening in the maritime domain like C-TPAT, 10 Plus 2 and the Proliferation Security Initiative. But this mandate isn’t one of them. It is time for Congress to cut and run on 100 percent scanning, and fast.

The Coast Guard Adapts — but will CNN?

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Reading a Coast Guard policy review issued by Vice Admiral R.J. Papp after the Great Bang Bang Non-Incident Incident on the Potomac, one is reassured by the pragmatic approach the Coast Guard brings to its operations. This is an agency unafraid to admit mistakes – even if it’s in the form of a non-denial denial (“we did nothing wrong, but …”) – and take corrective action.

The Great Bang Bang incident was the media dust-up that occurred when the Coast Guard was engaged in some training exercises on the Potomac and CNN producers overheard on a non-secured radio the words, “Bang! Bang!” and declared, on national television, that Washington was under attack.

These were the words heard ‘round cable television.

Bang. Bang.

It is still difficult for me to fathom how a guy barking into a radio can be mistaken for the percussive explosions of gunfire. Then again, I guess I’ve never been in the heat of mock battle – at least not since I was a kid. Maybe none of the folks at CNN have either.

CNN’s breathless coverage – complete with former Homeland Security Adviser Fran Townsend providing a play-by-play that was evidently unfolding in her head – propelled a terror-rattled nation to high alert. Planes were grounded. Secret Service eyes got more squinty. The blogosphere got more hysterical. And the rest of us started scrambling for duct tape.

Examining the Coast Guard’s in-depth review, one can’t help but conclude that this incident was largely a media invention. That’s not to say there isn’t plenty of blame to go around.

For one thing, the Coast Guard External Affairs shop didn’t help itself by failing to immediately tell CNN that the activity on the Potomac was a training exercise. Instead, CNN was simply told that there was “no information regarding any incidents on the Potomac.”

Clearly, something was going on, and CNN was right to investigate.

As one reads through the Coast Guard review, however, it becomes increasingly clear that the Coast Guard Headquarters, where External Affairs is situated, simply didn’t know what was going on and was scrambling to get information. Each time they received a call from CNN – a series of exchanges took place between approximately 9:30 and 10:00 a.m. – the Coast Guard press team ran it up the command and, evidently,  got no clear answer as to what was going down on the Potomac. This aspect of the Coast Guard review is vague and leaves unstated why the External Affairs team was left to, repeatedly, inform CNN only that “there were no incidents.” When you get that many calls from a national news organization, even if the media outlet is misinformed, it’s probably wise to address the misinformation as quickly as possible. Had they been able to inform CNN that the “incident” they were calling about was simply a training exercise, then that would have likely ended the matter.

Another thing that should have happened – which Admiral Papp acknowledges – was that the training exercise should have been halted as the confusion escalated. After being approached by various other law enforcement and questioned about what was going on, along with the repeated calls from news outlets, the Coast Guard had grounds to stand down.

That said, CNN had no credible evidence to go live with reports that some kind of confrontation was taking place on the Potomac – implying terrorist activity in the vicinity of the Pentagon, where the President just happened to be speaking. Their cameras were picking up evidence of Coast Guard activity, clearly, and they were hearing some weird things on the radio, but there was a time when national media organizations confirmed their facts before running with a story, particularly one with such potential for causing panic and alarm. For heaven’s sakes, when did CNN hire Orson Welles?

One suspects that – in this age of dropping market share and fierce competition from the Internet – the days of confirming facts before running with a story are over. Which makes all the more ironic the righteous whining you hear from traditional reporters about how they are the only ones who provide good, fact-based journalism and that without them, by god, the blogosphere will ruin the news industry, and democracy as we know it will limp forward in ignorance and partisanship. Uh-huh. No more Dick Nixons to kick around and all that.

There is one unintentionally funny line in the Coast Guard review, in which the Admiral asserts that “at no point during the training were the boat crews seeking media attention.” Clearly the Press Secretary didn’t write this memo. Boats with big guns in the perimeter of the White House, Pentagon and Congress don’t have to go looking for media coverage, and the Coast Guard should be more prepared to expect such attention in the future.

And, to their credit, they are.

The policy reforms suggested by Admiral Papp, now being reviewed by the chain of command, include a number of steps to prevent a similar incident from occurring in the future. Among those recommendations are some operational reforms, such as using training disclaimers that the general public (and eavesdropping reporters) can understand. He suggests: “This is a drill, this is a drill.” (Here’s one I might recommend: “Bang bang is a verbal approximation of actual gunfire, but it’s not real. It’s just me, some guy, shouting bang bang. My voice is not a gun; I repeat, my voice is not a gun.)

Another good recommendation offered in the memo is to provide a schedule of training exercises to other law enforcement with local jurisdiction.

However, as this was largely a media mess, the recommendations to strengthen the public affairs environment are of particular merit. These recommendations include developing an “active and aggressive” outreach plan to better inform the public and media about such training incidents; informing the media that Headquarters is a better source for policy questions, while the local commands in the field should be contacted for questions about tactical operations; educating reporters on how to contact those local field units; and training Coast Guard field units to more pro-actively reach out to media unless questions turn to policy issues.

Along with instituting a better chain of communication between Headquarters External Affairs and local field units – for those media calls that will inevitably come to Headquarters no matter how hard the Coast Guard tries to direct reporters to the field – these reforms will go a long way toward preventing another all-too-real crisis resulting from a mere training procedure. It will also go quite a ways toward improving the communications environment during legitimate crisis situations.

The Coast Guard deserves kudos for adapting to the new pressures of this new and evolving media environment.

Don’t count on CNN to be as adaptive or to initiate any reforms. The only responsibility its producers have taken for what occurred is to point fingers at the Coast Guard.

Chris Battle is the former Chief of Staff for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Director of Congressional and Public Affairs for the DEA. He is the Managing Partner of Adfero Group’s Homeland Security Strategic Communications Practice.

Coast Guard’s Confusion on the Potomac had plenty of blame to go around

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

The Coast Guard has come out with a report noting that while its simulated maritime attack along the Potomac — at a time when President Obama was in the vicinity for an event well publicized in advance — may have been ill-advised, it did not violate internal policies.

Well. That is an accurate assessment. One wonders whether internal policies should be revised.

In truth the Fiasco on the Potomac was the sloppy result of various parties, all of whom deny having engaged in any sloppiness whatsoever except for the Coast Guard. So kudos to them.

According the report, the White House did not properly inform the Coast Guard of the President's activities. The commandant of the unit involved was unaware of Obama's event; had he known, he acknowledges, he would have rescheduled.

Robert Gibbs, the president's press secretary, denied the White House had any responsibility and blamed the media for the screw-up. Good grief. How cliche is that?

And what of the media? They weren't clean either. In this age of the immediate news cycle, when various media outlets are hysterical to get the news first, and get it online before somebody else does, old-fashioned fact-checking seems to have gone out the window. CNN rushed the story to air, with breathless commentary of the attack as it was supposedly occurring, only to later be embarrassed. A review of the Coast Guard incident, by AP's Eileen Sullivan, shows just how ridiculous CNN's coverage was: "The training exercise was considered routine, consisted of seven separate drills and involved speeding boats. Instead of actually firing any shots, one of the exercise participants said "bang, bang, bang" over the radio when shots would have been fired if a real event. The TV networks noticed the activity and confused the simulated chatter for actual events."

Bang bang? How does a credible news organization confuse the equivalent of a line from a game of Cowboys & Indians with the sound of genuine gunfire?

CNN turns the blame back on the Coast Guard, claiming that its news office did contact the Coast Guard media shop to get verification but couldn't get calls returned immediately. If that is true, perhaps some more "internal policies" should be established at the Coast Guard.

A New CBP Commissioner: What Took So Long?

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

On Tuesday, President Obama nominated Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “Border Czar” Alan Bersin as the next Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the 57,000 person strong frontline agency. This ends what was a seemingly lengthy gap in political leadership at one of the nation’s flagship law enforcement agencies, but opens the door to a series of questions about Mr. Bersin’s role in the promised Obama Administration efforts to address immigration reform.

To say that Mr. Bersin has enormous professional shoes to fill would be an understatement. Since 9/11, CBP has been led by Robert C. Bonner, Ralph W. Basham and Jayson P. Ahern. Bonner was a five-time Senate confirmed law enforcement advocate who shined in merging separate agencies into CBP after 9/11. Ralph Basham’s career as a U.S. Secret Service agent for 30 years and the head of three separate DHS agencies is, if anything, even more impressive than Commissioner Bonner’s. Jay Ahern, the current Acting Commissioner and one of the premier Senior Executives in the federal government, worked his way up through the ranks during a 30 year career at CBP, has receive the rank of Distinguished Executive from President Bush in 2005 and was awarded the DHS Secretary’s Gold Medal for service in 2008. These are no security and law enforcement novices.

I don’t dwell on the resumes of the prior leadership to disparage Mr. Bersin’s somewhat less conventional resume for a top law enforcement position; I do so only to stress how serious and challenging this job is for any nominee. While Mr. Bersin clearly has knowledge of the current situation at our nation’s borders – some would say his last six months as the “Border Czar” were a tutorial period – his operational experience is more limited. However, his current reputation at DHS is positive and given his outgoing nature, he could be a solid selection to lead what is often known as “the face of homeland security” given CBP’s daily interaction with many stakeholders.

This leads us to two pressing questions about this nomination. The first is: Why was this political position so difficult to fill and left empty for so long? CBP is an enormous agency with an $11 billion dollar budget and a noble mission. More importantly, the Commissioner has an expansive office at the Ronald Reagan Building and the largest law enforcement air force in the world at his disposal.

Why was the eventual nominee in an office at DHS policy for six months with the “Border Czar” title?

I imagine the Obama Administration had trouble filling the post for two reasons. First, the presence of the “Border Czar” at DHS headquarters diminished the real power of the eventual Commissioner. Who wants to be the Senate-confirmed head of one of the nation’s premiere federal law enforcement agencies with operational authority effectively reporting to a policy guy at HQ?

Second, the Obama Administration’s commitment to the agency’s immigration-enforcement mission could be suspect as it has already rolled back enforcement efforts at CBP’s sister (or is it brother?) agency, Immigration and Custom’s Enforcement (ICE), to appease core administration political supporters. No one wants to volunteer for failure.

This initial question is doubly important when considering my second inquiry: What role will the head of CBP play in the promised immigration reform proposals we expect from the Obama administration in the next year?

After the failure of immigration reform in 2007, the Bush administration attempted to earn credibility with the American people by increasing Border Patrol staffing, building a 600 mile-long fence and strictly enforcing the nation’s immigration laws. Has the Obama administration selected an official who – working with Secretary Napolitano – will continue to push for strict enforcement in an effort to win over the public to some form of immigration reform?

I don’t know, but I expect the new Commissioner to focus on border security as it relates to drugs and weapons smuggling – which is a greater concern for current and former border state officials like Bersin and Napolitano – than dealing with immigration enforcement. This would be unfortunate for the 10,000 Border Patrol agents who joined CBP under the last administration and were promised the resources and support to secure our borders; they are too close to success to have new leadership change course.

I wish the Commissioner nominee the best of luck in what I hope is a speedy confirmation process. (I worked with Commissioner Basham – a man nominated by President Bush and endorsed by the late Senator Ted Kennedy – on his confirmation, and if Americans only knew how screwed up Congressional oversight of DHS is that the confirmation of the head of the U.S. Secret Service to be the Commissioner took more than four months, they would not sleep more soundly at night.)

America wants strong leadership on our borders, not only to keep us safe from terrorists, drugs and criminals, but to also earn credibility with our citizens so we can eventually have the immigration reform we so desperately need. Whether Bersin can give deliver that credibility and pave the road to reform will be his legacy within in the agency. Here’s hoping he can.

Unregulated small boats pose greatest vulnerability to U.S. maritime security, says Coast Guard Commandant

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

Admiral Thad Allen, commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, has been on a mission for going on three years now: To raise awareness of the security vulnerabilities presented by small boats on America’s largely unregulated and unrestricted waterways.

It’s a tougher mission than you might think. When the man responsible for protecting our waterways speaks about his number-one priority, people listen right? Well, that depends.

As Allen notes, recreational boating is big business in the United States. And boaters bristle at the notion of new regulations. Some, Allen observed, even seem to think the right to go where you want in a boat is carved right into the Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights up there with gun-ownin’ and free speechifying.

And just about every congressional district has its share of water – whether in the form of coastline, rivers, lakes, ports, gulfs, flooded streets or whathaveyou. Which means the politics of regulating small boats ain’t, as they say, bean bag. After all, what member of Congress in his or her right mind would want to go back to an angry district and take a stand on a potentially explosive national reform issue. …Er, okay, let’s rephrase that … what member of Congress in his or her right mind wants to go and take another whuppin’ from voters and constituents on something like recreational boating after the scars they’ve gotten in the health care debate?

So what’s the political answer? The usual … ignore the problem until you just can’t ignore it anymore. Toss in a red herring, if necessary. Congress has done both.

Despite repeated testimony from the Commandant about the need to address small-boat vulnerabilities in the United States, Congress has failed to even establish a serious conversation on this issue. Instead, the entire maritime and port security focus of the political class has been an unhealthy obsession with cargo security.  Not that cargo security itself is an unhealthy obsession – but the overly simplistic solution legislated out of Washington was to mandate the scanning of 100 percent of all cargo entering the United States. Yes, that’s right, every one of the 12 million or so containers entering the country’s ports every year.

Unlike telling weekend boaters that they may need to register their watercraft, telling the private sector that it must find a way to scan every piece of cargo is a politically popular position that comes with no (direct) cost to the federal government. Never mind that it would likely cripple the supply chain and result in less security over the long run.

As Allen has previously (and repeatedly) observed: Small boats pose a greater threat to port security than the “nuke in a box” scenario. “All of our threat and vulnerability assessments for the major ports around this country tell us that while containers are important, we may be thinking too container-centric since the events of 9/11, and the notion of a water-borne improvised explosive device needs to be dealt with,” Allen told an audience of the Surface Navy Association.

While Congress is urging that untold resources be dedicated to examining the contents of millions of cargo containers (regardless of the likely threat level of individual containers and shipments), a terrorist could simply motor an explosive device via a small boat right up to a liquid gas facility. Or just about anything else. Because there is no – none, nada, zip – regulatory infrastructure in place to prevent it.

Sound far-fetched? Remember the USS Cole?

Or how about this one: Mumbai? The Pakistani terrorists who rained gunfire on residents in the Indian city of Mumbai got into position by beaching a small watercraft in an unsecured area, guided by the kind of handheld GPS devices you could pick up at Radio Shack, and simply walked into the city to launch their attack.

During a Coast Guard media pen and pad hosted by Allen last week, he returned to this theme and noted several ways in which small boats could be easily used to inflict damage:

  • Using a shoulder-held rocket from a small boat strategically positioned. (Remember that rocket-propelled grenade launchers are a commonly used weapon among al Qaeda and its ilk.)
  • Delivering a weapon of mass destruction via a small boat
  • Using a small boat to deliver an improvised explosive device (as with the Cole)
  • Strategic landing of terrorists (as with Mumbai)

Allen compared to the regulation of the airways, which also have recreational users, to the lack thereof when it comes to the waterways. In aviation, practically everything is controlled; in maritime, practically nothing is.

The Commandant noted that there are a number of different approaches that could be considered, from the use of registration, as in the aviation sector, to less comprehensive tactics such as prohibiting waterway access near facilities of national security significance. He appears open to compromise and new ideas. He just wants to get the debate going.

“It shouldn’t take a public event to start a debate,” he said.

Indeed.

Lawlessness At Sea

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Americans have been lulled into a false sense of security since being so far removed from the attacks of September 11, 2001.  Though many suggestions of the 9/11 Commission have been enacted, there are still many significant holes in our country’s maritime and port security.  Many Americans are shocked, and horrified, to learn that approximately 225 hostages are being held off the Somali coast at this very moment.  This security threat is far from solved, and in my opinion, the U.S. gave up a long time ago its preeminence in the maritime sector.

Piracy will continue to be a problem as long as Somalia remains a failed state.  Africa writ large is a broader security concern, but you cannot address the symptom of piracy without taking on the disease ashore.  The policy options all are lacking and reflect a broader strategic threat Africom was created to address. The bottom line: lawlessness on shore leads to lawlessness at sea.

The United States Navy is struggling with responding to the threat due to being spread too thin from imperial overstretch and an unwillingness to tackle this issue for other strategic and cultural reasons. Inviting an international flotilla to assist, as we’re helping coordinate, makes a lot of sense for many reasons but also raises some uncomfortable realities – such as Chinese combatants in the Indian Ocean.

The surprise of the Maersk Alabama was not that it was captured by pirates, but that a U.S. flag ship still exists on international routes.  International shipping is essentially stateless — with commercial tankers now built, owned, insured, crewed and flagged in many different places.  Each actor is loathe to assume liability, and many of these sailors are still hostage because no one wants to pay to cut them loose.

The UAE’s Dubai Ports World (DPW) fiasco a few years back was also emblematic of this broader crisis; Americans do not control, much less understand, international shipping and why it is vitally important to national interests.

There is the possibility of an alarming criminal nexus between the Middle East, London and the Puntland region in Somalia.  The stooges doing the hijacking are just pawns of bigger, shadowy forces.  What happens to the millions of ransom payments?  These suitcases of cash being dropped from helicopters are not being invested in Mogadishu hedge funds.

Senate Committee Quashes Obama’s Immigration Rollbacks

Friday, July 10th, 2009

By Jena Baker McNeil

On Thursday, July 9, 2009, the U.S. Senate approved an amendment, as part of the DHS appropriations bill, to stop the Department of Homeland Security from rolling back Social Security No-Match–which helps ensure that employers are not employing illegal immigrants. The Obama Administration had announced plans Wednesday to rescind No-Match, and place instead greater emphasis on the use of E-Verify in workplace immigration enforcement. Sen. Sessions also won an amendment that would make E-Verify permanent and mandatory. This amended bill still has to pass the overall Senate, but it is a good step forward in terms of maintaining immigration enforcement efforts.

The Obama Administration, for its part, has attempted to portray this move as getting in the way of ‘real progress’ on immigration.  In reality, rescinding No-Match is quite the opposite of real progress.  Social Security No-Match was put in place during the Bush Administration in order to assist in workplace enforcement.  No match letters are sent when an employer hires new workers whose personal information (e.g. name and Social Security number) does not match SSA records. Based on these letters, employers are supposed to take certain steps to either resolve the matter.  Heritage Foundation experts Cully Stimson and Andrew Grossman go over this process in detail in their Backgrounder, No-Match Immigration Enforcement: Time for Action.  No-Match (like many government regulations) has undergone litigation and was enjoined by the courts. But the Obama Administration has chosen to abandon it instead of ensuring its implementation.  The Administration claims that E-Verify is going to reign in workplace enforcement.  But this seems contrary to its opposition to the Sessions E-Verify amendment that would make E-Verify permanent. And while E-Verify is certainly a vital element in this process, it can’t be the end of the road for workplace enforcement– E-Verify currently isn’t mandatory, DHS will be doing a lot less enforcement absent No-Match, not more.

Enforcing immigration in the workplace is only one part of a real solution to immigration.  The Administration’s recent actions beg the question- what is the Obama Administration’s plan for immigration? There has been more than rumblings that it plans to pressure Congress to take up a comprehensive  or ‘amnesty’ bill this fall.  But there has been a lot of skepticism, mostly centered on the notion that the American public simply will not support such a move.  And for good reason, the economy is in the tank, and the thought of a costly amnesty does not sit well on the minds, or the wallets of most Americans.

Can We Return to Sanity? A Plea for Risk-Based Security

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

In “Wanted: A Smarter Immigration Policy,” Ted Alden of the Council on Foreign Relations offers an excellent analysis of what’s wrong with our immigration process – or at least, one of the things that is wrong with our broken immigration process. In a nutshell, his is an argument – a desperate plea really – for a return to risk-based security procedures that use intelligence and information to prioritize threats rather than the hopelessly ineffective but increasingly popular notion on Capitol Hill that we can prevent 100 percent of all threats we may face.

Do we really need, for instance, to do in-person interviews of everyone who seeks a visa, even if they have already been interviewed for visas in the past, and we already have their fingerprints on U.S. government databases? That only wastes scarce consular resources on low-risk travelers. Is it necessary to pull all male travelers from Muslim countries into the long humiliation of secondary screening at the airport, even those who are frequent visitors well-known to U.S. officials? It is time to reassert some common sense … Of all the initiatives undertaken in the name of homeland security after 9/11, the visa screening requirements for foreign scientists and engineers have probably done the most lasting damage to America’s economy — particularly in the cutting-edge technology fields that are vital to our economic leadership and national security.

Alden’s right. His particular focus is immigration, but the same logic – that we must prioritize threats based upon risk – applies across the board in the homeland security environment. Risk-based and layered security measures are the universally accepted best practices among security experts – unless you isolate a particular vulnerability and task a particular security agency with ensuring that nothing gets through. When that happens, you get situations of the sort Alden refers to, with the State Department and the FBI preferring to create massive backlogs and waste in the immigration screening process, in an effort to scan 100 percent of any particular group, rather than judiciously putting risk-based procedures into place. While individual lives are ruined (visa holders who return to their native countries for a vacation and find that they can’t quickly get back into the United States, losing their homes or jobs or private property), the agencies have covered themselves so no congressional inquiry can put the blame on them should something go wrong in the future. (And as everybody knows, there will be another terrorist attack at some point, and, as is Congress’s tendency, somebody – besides Congress – will need to be blamed.)

You see the same kind of brain-dampened approach to security in the supply chain environment. Well-known security experts like Congressman Ed Markey of Massachusetts have led the effort to apply the 100 percent model to cargo security. (For the Markey fan(s?) out there lacking any sense of irony or experience in homeland security, the reference to his expertise in security is sarcasm; he’s a politician, not a security expert, though it seems many members of Congress seem to confuse the two.) So just as you have stunning backlogs in the immigration screening process, we will soon be facing similar backlogs in the international supply chain. In this case, the economic damage to which Alden refers above will not be indirect. It will not take prescient reporters or scholars to point out how shutting out key segments of our workforce will damage our economy. Once our global competitiveness is undermined, and international trade is routinely disrupted, the damage to our economy will be clear and immediate.

And for what? Scanning 100 percent of the cargo that enters our nation’s borders will not make us safer. Indeed, numerous credible third-party reports indicate that the 100 percent model could make us less safe. But, then, that doesn’t play as well on the campaign trail.

©2008 Adfero Group. All Rights Reserved.