<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSA&#8217;s  Security Breach &#8211; The Posting of the Classified Standard Operating Procedures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/12/15/tsas-security-breach-the-posting-of-the-classified-standard-operating-procedures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/12/15/tsas-security-breach-the-posting-of-the-classified-standard-operating-procedures/</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:49:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: webroalty</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/12/15/tsas-security-breach-the-posting-of-the-classified-standard-operating-procedures/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>webroalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=6901#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Your website is very informative. &lt;br&gt;I like it very much. Keep up the good work.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webroyalty.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;webroyalty&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your website is very informative. <br />I like it very much. Keep up the good work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webroyalty.com/" rel="nofollow">webroyalty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factchecker</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/12/15/tsas-security-breach-the-posting-of-the-classified-standard-operating-procedures/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>factchecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=6901#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Mr. Blank,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since you said you were in a leadership position at TSA and therefore could be perceived as being knowledgeable about things there, I think it&#039;s important for this blog&#039;s readers to note that you have some errors in your post.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, TSA&#039;s SOP is not classified.  That&#039;s an inaccurate and misleading term for those not familiar with designation and classification terms.  The SOP is Sensitive Security Information.  It&#039;s bad that the SSI information got out, and good to see people are being punished, but it&#039;s not a classified info leak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You also imply that multiple SOPs - dealing with the screening of people and baggage - were leaked.  That&#039;s not correct.  The one SOP that got posted without correct redaction was the screening management SOP, which doesn&#039;t cover how screeners actually screen people or bags. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&#039;re going to write a post about your former agency, you could at least take the time to get your facts right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Blank,</p>
<p>Since you said you were in a leadership position at TSA and therefore could be perceived as being knowledgeable about things there, I think it&#39;s important for this blog&#39;s readers to note that you have some errors in your post.  </p>
<p>First, TSA&#39;s SOP is not classified.  That&#39;s an inaccurate and misleading term for those not familiar with designation and classification terms.  The SOP is Sensitive Security Information.  It&#39;s bad that the SSI information got out, and good to see people are being punished, but it&#39;s not a classified info leak.</p>
<p>You also imply that multiple SOPs &#8211; dealing with the screening of people and baggage &#8211; were leaked.  That&#39;s not correct.  The one SOP that got posted without correct redaction was the screening management SOP, which doesn&#39;t cover how screeners actually screen people or bags. </p>
<p>If you&#39;re going to write a post about your former agency, you could at least take the time to get your facts right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
