<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS Prep – Does Anybody Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/11/03/private-sector-prep-does-anybody-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/11/03/private-sector-prep-does-anybody-care/</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:13:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thecigarenthusisast</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2009/11/03/private-sector-prep-does-anybody-care/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>thecigarenthusisast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=6548#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I recently read an article concerning PS Prep and Supply Chain.  Though PS Prep has value to improve community resilience, it by far is not prepared to support verification, validation, or certification of supply chain risk management or ensure that their supply chain partners are prepared.  The BIA activity and the use of the &quot;word--Supply Chain&quot; within  (NFPA 1600, ASIS SPC.1, BS 25999 Parts 1 and 2) for Implementation leading to private sector certification doesn’t support supply chain activities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like others (e.g. William G. Raisch is the Director of the International Center for Enterprise Preparedness (InterCEP) at New York University) over states the current capability of the BC/BCM standards and PS Prep program.  IT Supply Chain and Products/Services Supply Chain require different standards, validation, and certification.   Listing to Mr. Raisch who sells used Volkswagens as though they are BMW’s--he has found The Da Vinci Code for combining the two activities under PS Prep.  How preposterous and self serving!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get it right or don’t talk about it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read an article concerning PS Prep and Supply Chain.  Though PS Prep has value to improve community resilience, it by far is not prepared to support verification, validation, or certification of supply chain risk management or ensure that their supply chain partners are prepared.  The BIA activity and the use of the &#8220;word&#8211;Supply Chain&#8221; within  (NFPA 1600, ASIS SPC.1, BS 25999 Parts 1 and 2) for Implementation leading to private sector certification doesn’t support supply chain activities.</p>
<p>Like others (e.g. William G. Raisch is the Director of the International Center for Enterprise Preparedness (InterCEP) at New York University) over states the current capability of the BC/BCM standards and PS Prep program.  IT Supply Chain and Products/Services Supply Chain require different standards, validation, and certification.   Listing to Mr. Raisch who sells used Volkswagens as though they are BMW’s&#8211;he has found The Da Vinci Code for combining the two activities under PS Prep.  How preposterous and self serving!!!</p>
<p>Get it right or don’t talk about it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
