|     |     |  About Us   |   Archives   |   Contact Us |

Sign up for Security Debrief Newsletters



Archive for September, 2008

Intellectual Property Act Not Enough

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Despite the passage by Congress this weekend of the controversial Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property, or PRO-IP Act, there is still not enough being done to protect Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The potential profit from trafficking in counterfeit goods continues to outweigh the penalties and enforcement resources presently in place that act as deterrence.

When I was selected to be the Special Agent in Charge of the Office of Investigations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the Department of Homeland Security in New York City in 2003, I was briefed on all the significant investigations in the office. One of the cases I was briefed on was Operation Panda. Operation Panda was a multi-agency investigation of Asian criminal gang activity in Flushing (NY) and the Chinatown    section of Manhattan. It ultimately resulted in multiple federal criminal arrests and significant civil seizures.

I was not surprised by the scope of criminal activity being conducted by this criminal organization. I expected narcotics, extortion, theft, robberies, murder, prostitution – crimes usually associated with “gang”
activity. I was surprised by the amount of trafficking in counterfeit goods they were involved in — literally millions of dollars of fake clothing, handbags, sneakers, sunglasses, watches, fragrances, etc.

And why not counterfeiting ? It makes a lot of sense from a dollars and cents versus riskpoint of view. Sophisticated criminal organizations identify and exploit targets of opportunity. They will commit crimes in areas where they believe they can turn a profit, particularly if the criminal/civil penalties involved (and resources dedicated to enforce them) are not large enough to act as a deterrent. Trafficking in counterfeit goods is and continues to be one of those areas.

Intellectual property is estimated to drive the U.S. economy by $3.5 trillion, accounting for 18 million jobs and half of all U.S. exports. Counterfeiting is estimated to be a $600 billion a year industry, up from $5.5 billion in 1982. In this time of “economic downturn”, counterfeiting is estimated to cost the United States 750,000 jobs.

You can do the math here…. Someone will always be involved in counterfeiting, but until we treat this criminal activity as seriously as other crimes that damage our society and way of life, it will continue to flourish.

Coast Guard Explores Web 2.0

Monday, September 29th, 2008

The U.S. Coast Guard has always been on the cutting edge of communications. At a time when its mother agency, the Department of Homeland Security, is still struggling with simply putting video online, the Coast Guard has long since developed its own channel on YouTube. Years ago, the Coasties recognized the value of gathering photos and video — not only for operational and training purposes but also using it to communicate with the public and explain the mission, hazards, challenges and successes of the organization. Whereas many law enforcement and national security organizations view the media with a jaundiced eye, the Coast Guard has long understood the fundamental value of pro-actively engaging the media in an effort to communicate to the public at large. And its reputation is the better for it.

Consider the praise the Coast Guard received for the valiant efforts of the men and women who put their own lives in danger to save others during Katrina, Rita, Gustav and Ike. Footage of dramatic rescues. Orange choppers breaking through inky skies. Bodies pulled from roiling seas.

All the praise the Coast Guard received for its professionalism during these emergency hours was well deserved. However, there were a number of first responders who performed acts of heroism, but you will never hear of most of them. Unless a news crew happened to be positioned nearby, the work was done in anonymity. And there is certainly nothing wrong with anonymity. The urge to save a life is not motivated by a camera crew. Nonetheless, by capturing the work it does, the Coast Guard has a treasure trove captured on digital disk. Training film. Records of evidence. A digital blackbox should something go terribly wrong. And, yes, exciting video that can be shared with the media and the public. Not for bragging rights. But to educate that critical audience about the mission of the Coast Guard. To explain to the public: This is how we do what we do. To instill a sense of confidence in the everyday Americans that if they find themselves in trouble off the coast, these guys will be there.

The Coast Guard should be applauded for its pro-active approach to communications. And now it should be applauded taking it to the next level. The Coast Guard has announced an organization-wide effort to begin experimenting with social media — Web 2.0, Facebook, the blogosphere, and a variety of other online communications tools.

Credit must go to Admiral Thad Allen, the commandant of the Coast Guard, who has personally led the way and set the tone. Below is a video that Admiral Allen shot in which he addresses the entire leadership of the Coast Guard, urging them to familiarize themselves with Web 2.0 tools such as Facebook, the blogosphere, LinkedIn, YouTube, etc.

Indeed, “urge” is a diplomatic way of putting it. The Admiral pretty much gave marching orders. The world of communications, he notes, is undergoing a “revolution.” The old way of interacting — fraternal meetings and bricks-and-mortar social clubs — are being replaced by online variations. This is how the younger generations of Coasties interact, and it’s how a growing segment of the public at large interacts, he notes. Therefore, it is “critically important” that the leadership of the Coast Guard understand this environment and, equally important, participate in it.

And, to make his point unmistakeably clear, he uploaded his marching orders to YouTube. No teletypes or staff-meeting where the word trickles down. One video, from the man himself, looking directly in the eye of very Coastie. Nice job, Admiral.

It’s clear that Admiral Allen is doing more than issuing orders. He has set up an account on Facebook personally (and the Coast Guard has a page as well), and has taken to social media as a way to communicate with his organization. He engages in blogger roundtables.

It is unfortunate that he stumbled during a recent blogger roundtable, when he made a comment that was interpreted as distinguishing between “journalists” and “bloggers.” The comment made a lot of waves in the blogosphere, and the Admiral took some heat for it. Truth is, it seems that the lawyers may have gotten the better of common sense during whatever debate took place internally by settling on a FOIA interpretation that “traditional” journalists can have access to the FOIA’d documents but not bloggers (at least without a hefty price).

It’s unclear where a “blogger” who is a full-time writer for the New York Times or National Journal or Government Executive would fit into that murky distinction. Traditional journalists or blogger? What about all those high-powered journalists who write primarily for the online version of the Politico?

Admiral Allen is right that the communications environment is undergoing a revolution. Not only in the sense that some of the tools are changing. The very way we communicate is changing. Admiral Allen gets that. When he says that the old days of physical social clubs are being challenged by online versions, he’s right.  Another aspect of that revolution that folks haven’t completely come to understand yet is the advent of transparency. Sunlight. With every passing month and year, it will be more and more difficult to keep certain documents in the shadows.  There are too many instant technological tools to find and retrieve information. The smartest organizations won’t try to fight that trend. They’ll acknowledge the inevitable and find ways to use it to their advantage. The others, probably the majority, will fight for a while until they can’t anymore. And their reputations will have taken a Cheneyesque fall.

I for one believe that the Coast Guard will work its way through this and come out ahead of the game. The Coasties always come out on top. They’ve got good poeople. They’ve got a commandant who’s come up through the ranks, is an  old sailer, but is as comfortable creating a Facebook page as he is typing memos on one-finger-jab old typewriter.

This is a good sign. Admiral Allen, we salute you.

Closing of the American Border

Friday, September 26th, 2008

There haven’t been many “insider” books about how DHS has functioned but a good one has appeared. The Closing of the American Border was published last week by Edward Alden of the Council on Foreign Relations and formerly with the Financial Times. It’s a detailed look at the policies and programs deployed after 9/11 to deter and detect terrorists hoping to use our transportation systems against us. If the acronyms NSEERS or PNR mean anything to you, you’ll enjoy the recounting. Some of the book relates to the period before DHS was created, including the legislative debate about the department’s scope and missions. But most relates to how DHS struggled within its new structure and within interagency policymaking to fix holes in immigration and aviation systems, and the negative impacts on legitimate trade and travel.

Of course, the personalities who worked together most of the time, and butted heads on occasion, are highlighted. While the recounting of turf wars is not pretty in the rear-view mirror, it is encouraging that Alden makes a real effort to understand the stresses DHS was under and the fact that its officials put in herculean efforts to do what they thought was best for the country.

My only compliant about the book is that its narrative ends too soon, essentially around the time Secretary Ridge departed in 2005. Some of the problems, like student visa enrollment, visa wait times and privacy fears, have improved. New programs, like Global Entry and WHTI, are using advanced technology to move low-risk travelers through the border. Significant challenges – US-VISIT exit, Visa Waiver expansion, etc – remain so there is no reason to reflect 2004 facts to describe the current state of border facilitation.

All in all, though, for anybody reading this type of blog, The Closing of the American Border is a must-read.

Cop Car of the Future Here Today

Thursday, September 25th, 2008

Carbon Motors has built the world’s first car designed by law enforcement for law enforcement:

Thirsty? Better Get Used to It!

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

Try putting lipstick on this pig: when it comes to safe, clean, and reliable water services, we’re about to screw ourselves (and the world).  According to a new report from the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), unless the U.S. changes its current approach to domestic and international water policy, the “global water challenge will soon become a global water crisis.”  Unfortunately, they’re spot on.

Dear Mr. President, Madam Speaker, and Mr. Senate Leader: Water is important, and not just because Michael Phelps swims in it!  Though, if you ask his Olympic teammate Ryan Lochte, he’ll agree too, emphatically.  In fact, Lochte used “Beijing’s finest” tap water to brush his teeth and spent the next four days sick and trying to figure out where he’d gone wrong.  Turns out China was willing to spend millions of dollars on fake fireworks, but they weren’t willing to spring for a little chlorine to keep Captain Speedo and the other Olympians healthy.  Classy.

Besides swimming, we rely on safe, clean, and reliable water services for the following:

•Fire suppression – Firefighters use more than spit to extinguish flames, true story;
•Running hospitals – Avoiding things like cleaning surgical instruments, draining bedpans, and washing hands is generally frowned upon by the medical community;
•Cooling computer servers – In case you’re wondering, over-heated servers impact little things like banks, office buildings, and your friendly local FBI field office; and
•Flushing toilets – No additional details needed.

While we don’t have to face the realities of life without reliable water services (yet), unless of course you live in the lower 9th ward, billions of our global neighbors do.  Fortunately, there’s a lot we can do to help.  As a nation, we can incorporate a sustained and comprehensive focus on water within our international humanitarian, health, economic, environmental, and security relief work.  Acting through what CSIS refers to as “enlightened selfishness,” the US can best preserve its own water by helping those beyond our shores protect and preserve theirs.  According to CSIS, the following key changes could make all the difference:

•Interdependencies – Recognize the linkages between agriculture, energy, and water.  Major policy decisions will be made at the start of a new Administration in each of these areas, they shouldn’t occur in a vacuum;
•Expansion & Partnership – Expand the Office of the Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs to include a new “Bureau for International Water Policy.”  Then send a memo to the Bureau’s Chief mandating immediate action to strengthen the government’s relationship with NGOs.  Seriously guys, NGOs are not the devil.
•Commitment – Create a politically durable long-term agreement that provides financial resources for tackling water issues.  We give money for hippies to poop on canvases and call it “art,” why not try paying to help Ethiopians conserve enough water to grow sustainable crops and call it “moral?”

That’s it, my rant is done, you’ve got the answers to the test, share them with your neighbors.  I’m off to drink a nice cool glass of water.  I’ve got to act now, while supplies still last…

FOIA and Alternative Media – Correcting Mischaracterizations

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

By LCDR Tony Russell
Press Secretary to the Commandant

Security Debrief’s “Homeland Blogwatch” recently carried a repost by Coast Guard Report, which is a Web site not affiliated with the U. S. Coast Guard. The post simplified and mischaracterized information provided by Admiral Thad Allen during a DOD sponsored Bloggers Roundtable.

To ensure your readers have complete information, I encourage them to view the transcript of the Roundtable. They can also listen to the event.

To be clear, the Coast Guard does not hold the position that all bloggers are not journalists. The Commandant’s point was that not all bloggers are appropriately categorized as “news media” for the sake of
Freedom of Information Act fees.

The Coast Guard is committed to organizational transparency and compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Any entity or person may have access to government documents under
FOIA unless the documents are exempted from release. The Coast Guard is guided by the Department of Justice Freedom of Information Act Guide, the Coast Guard Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts Manual (COMDTINST M5260.3.l), and legal precedent. COMDTINST M5260.3 sets policy and procedures for responding to FOIA requests. For the most part, requestors pay for the cost of producing material in response to a FOIA request and the Coast Guard FOIA manual guides Coast Guard personnel in categorizing requestors and then calculating applicable fees for searching, reviewing, and duplicating responsive FOIA materials based on the requestor’s category.

If a requester is categorized as “representative of the news media,” then only duplication fees after the first 100 pages are assessed. Whether alternative media (i.e. bloggers) are eligible for categorization as “representative of the news media” is an evolving legal issue based on the extent to which the alternative media has infused its content with sufficient journalistic rigor and whether it is organized and operated to publish or broadcast news to the public.

Simply put, not all online content constitutes journalism that warrants the cost of FOIA production to be borne by the American taxpayer. This is not a value judgment on the content of a blog or other online site, it is simply the application of federal law and guidelines in determining whether an activity is journalism, the Coast Guard may consider a requestor’s past work as compared to accepted professional standards of journalism, including, but not limited to:

The Coast Guard’s intent is to achieve openness of its records by applying U.S. government guidelines consistently in a way that does not burden the U. S. taxpayer with underwriting the FOIA requests of individuals or groups that are not eligible for a lower fee level.

LCDR Tony Russell,
Press Secretary to the Commandant
——–
This is an official United States Coast Guard posting for the public’s information. Our posting does not endorse this site or anything on it, including links to other sites, and we disclaim responsibility and liability for the site and its content.

Keeping Our Eye on the Ball — Al Qaeda Still a Threat

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

Reports that Al Qaeda is imploding are vastly exaggerated. Below are some facts that shed some light on the issue.

1. Sunnis constitute approximately 85% of the Moslem world. Fatwas by Sunni Wahhabi and Salafi leaders in Saudi Arabia and other parts of the Sunni Moslem world are gaining popularity among religious Sunnis around the world.
2. The threat by Islamic extremists to Western and US interests is funded primarily by Sunni Wahhabis and Salafis who continue to open new madrassas and religious schools in South Asia (Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India), Africa (north and sub-Saharan Africa), East Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia) and Saudi Arabia that are graduating a new generation of suicide bombers. President Bush was dead on target when he stated that this conflict would endure a generation or more.
3. Al Qaeda has already inspired the establishment of several new independent extremist Sunni groups in many parts of the Arab world, including Lebanon, Jordan, Yemen, Morocco, and Algeria. These new groups do not necessarily coordinate with Al Qaeda but could be as deadly nonetheless.
4. The one important positive development against Al Qaeda among Sunni Arab Moslems has taken place in Iraq but has been largely driven by tribes that had never embraced religious extremism in the past.

The obsession with the Iranian threat and its proxy Hezbollah by some analysts and experts is diverting attention from the real and protracted deadly conflict with Saudi Wahhabi/Salafi funded Islamic extremism.

The conflict between the United States and Iran is between two states. Though very serious in its nature, this conflict, however, is over geopolitical and strategic regional interests and should therefore be seen and addressed through that context. On the other hand, the conflict with Sunni Wahhabi/Salafi funded and nurtured Islamic extremism is at the heart of the War on Terror.

Let’s not forget that all 19 terrorist hijackers on September 11, 2001, were Sunni extremists and 15 of them were Saudis. Keeping our eye on the ball will help us avoid making deadly mistakes.

Implications of the Financial Crisis

Monday, September 22nd, 2008

The financial crisis continues to spread, within the past two weeks, we have seen the fall of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and AIG in the US alone. (In the United Kingdom HBOS has fallen, with others on rocky ground, and in Australia Macquarie Bank is likewise at risk.)

These are fiscal events, and many in the security and law enforcement arenas (for the two are different, despite the perceptions of many that expertise in one translates to expertise in the other) are thinking about their own personal finances, but not about the implications for their operations.

A series of events now have higher likelihoods, while others remain remote at this time.  The two events I am most concerned about are a disgruntled, laid off worker “going postal”, and large protests turning violent.  Both incidents have critical implications for the company and community where they take place.  I visited a major software company recently and was appalled at the lack of understanding, and the lack of co-operation with their local law enforcement about the common processes and procedures necessary for dealing with such a threat.

Companies must be paying very close attention to their security in times of unrest.  There is a duty to care for all, even those being laid off, and measures must be put in place to protect the employees.  As horrible as it sounds, an enforced no weapons policy now may prevent a much more negative public event later.

There are precedents globally for financial turmoil leading to public order events; one of the most immediately relevant is the poll tax riots (31 Mar 1990) in the United Kingdom.  It was not the disenfranchised, the ‘weird and marginalised’ who were on the streets in protest, but the working and middle classes who were financially threatened and feared that their voices were not being heard.  What started as a demonstration became a riot largely because the violence was instigated by Class War (an Anarchist group) and some members of Militant (extreme left wingers, originally part of the Labour Party).  The policing response was harsh, broad and indiscriminate, and managed to turn a peaceful protest with small violent groups into widespread violence.  The policing response very much resembled what was seen in St. Paul and Denver during the conventions, and there are serious lessons that must be learned for the future.

Given the state of the markets today and concern about 401ks and future livelihoods, such events are no longer inconceivable.  Although such events are probably some time off, and will be rare, a police department’s inability to deal with an event in a manner that respects the members of the population, while effectively policing them, will have terrible consequences.  To be frank, the inappropriate uses of force and mass arrests that were common in St. Paul against “fringe elements,” will not be so easily dismissed when it is members of the middle class.  Police departments would be well advised to revise their public order plans and capabilities now.

G-Men and Journalists

Sunday, September 21st, 2008

The Newseum, one of Washington D.C.’s newer museums, recently launched a temporary exhibit covering the 100-year anniversary of the FBI – called “G-Men and Journalists.” If you are in Washington DC and can swallow the pretentious price tag ($20 per ticket in a town filled with some of the nation’s best museums which are free to the public), it’s worth a few hours of your time.

Like most of the exhibits at the Newseum, G-Men and Journalists offers more a tour of current affairs and history-in-the-making than any final verdict on a particular topic. The first rough draft of history, as they say. The exhibit’s subject matter runs the gamut – from the FBI’s reputation-forging War on Crime during the Depression Era, with shootouts with the likes of Dillinger, Ma Barker and Pretty Boy Floyd, to the Lindberg Kidnapping and the counter-culture violence of the Sixties and Seventies to the less political and more sociological terrorism of the Nineties.

The perspective, however, is less from the pen of a J.Edgar Hoover or Louis Freeh than from the typewriter of a Walter Winchell or Jack Anderson, popular journalists of their day. Winchell was one of the FBI’s most reliable friends, Anderson one of their most reliable critics. Each served his purpose. Winchell helped personally set up the surrender of the boss of Murder Inc.; Anderson helped peel back the layers of secrecy that allowed Hoover to spy on American citizens.

You can see the death mask of John Dillinger, complete with nicks in the cheekbones resulting from a hail of bullets; you can run your fingers along the Unabomber’s surreal cabin, small and crude and seemingly incapable of housing the mad soul of Ted Kaczynski ; you can see the crankshaft that was thrown hundreds of yards when Timothy McVeigh left a Ryder truck parked next to the Oklahoma City Federal Building; and you can examine a courtroom model of a banal-looking blue Caprice, where DC Snipers John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo took aim at innocents from the safety of its nearly closed trunk.

You need not be a g-man or a journalist to appreciate this exhibit, though you do probably need a stout heart. By the end of the tour, the air will likely have been sucked out of you and you’ll find yourself needing a break in the sunlight. The crime explored in the initial displays, safe with the distance of nearly a century, seem almost like caricature – the Lady in the Red Dress, Bonnie and Clyde, Baby Face Nelson. Even the weapons seem – wrongly – like playthings, the props of a James Cagney movie. As you move forward, though, the weapons take on more recognizable and chilling features, the kind of killing tools we face today. Even the unusual ones, like Kaczynski’s pipe bomb – simple, crude, with household nails built into the casing for no other purpose than to slice flesh. The violence of the crimes loses any halo of Robin Hood mythology. Video of Waco, with agents searching desperately for the children in the compound as it crumbles in flames, set afire by Koresh and his followers, the parents of these same children. A fireman walking away from the destruction of Oklahoma City, a one-year-old little girl, hair wet with blood, dying in his arms.

And you’re left to reflect on this notion that John Dillinger was ever held up in American popular culture as some kind of folk hero. That Sixties-era radicals, who planted bombs in our neighborhoods, are embraced in some quarters today as, to use the words of Chicago mayor Richard Daley, “valued members” of the community. On the grotesque line of logic that leads some anti-government extremists to hold up Timothy McVeigh as a martyr.

And as you trudge out of the G-Men and Journalists exhibit, on your way to the 9/11 exhibit, you find yourself in need of that break, fresh air and sunlight and some sense of faith that we aren’t really like this.

At Least 40 Killed in Huge Explosion at Pakistan Hotel

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

At Least 40 Killed in Huge Explosion at Pakistan Hotel – NYTimes.com

A suicide truck bomber attacked the Marriott Hotel in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, on Saturday, killing at least 40 people, wounding nearly 200 and starting a fire that swept through the hotel.

The explosion came hours after new President Asif Ali Zardari, widower of assassinated former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, made his first address to parliament a few hundred meters away, calling for terrorism to be rooted out.

As flames engulfed the hotel, which is popular with foreigners including diplomats and also rich Pakistanis, police said there were still people trapped inside.

There must be a word for people like this…

Friday, September 19th, 2008

As more and more supplies are coming into the areas affected by Hurricane Ike and these items are being distributed to people in need — we are starting to get some of the first reports of people abusing the offered services.

Example A, as reported by Houston television station KHOU-TV, is a news story chronicling the joys of self-described Baytown, Texas ‘Uninteresting Teacher’ Jacki Steinhauer.

Jacki seems to have developed a palette for the MREs (Meals Ready to Eat) that are being distributed to thousands of Gulf Coast residents in need. These are folks who have been displaced because of having no power in their homes or because their homes have been so destroyed as to make them unlivable. The problem with Jacki’s choice in meals is that SHE DOES NOT NEED OR DESERVE IT!

According to the KHOU-TV report, Jacki has no damage to her home and she has power. The only thing that Jacki does not seem to have is a clue or a conscience.

Since her school is closed because of the post-Ike issues, Jacki decided to take to the Internet and blog about her experiences in acquiring items she does not need and what she likes about MREs. Here are some of her posted thoughts:

“Life is great after a hurricane when nothing really happened to your house!”

“I think that I am falling in love with MREs. They are pretty darn good. I went around 5:30 to go get more MREs and actually got another box of real MREs, water, and ice.”

“Yesterday I ate meatballs with marinara sauce, almonds, wheat bread with cheese sauce, pretzels, and the orange punch. Today’s meal was chili mac, applesauce, a pop-tart, wheat bread with cheese sauce, fruit punch, and apple cider.”

“It is so cool that you put a little bit of water in the bag with the food and in about a minute, there is hot food.

This is great. I don’t have school and getting free food!”

Congratulations Jacki. You just made yourself a pariah. There are hundreds, if not thousands of people who could have used the bottled water, ice and meals you decided to help yourself too. It was just too good of a deal for you to pass up.

Instead of taking real ‘advantage’ of your time off from the classroom and say… I don’t know… volunteering to help some of your fellow Texans, you decided to take selfish advantage of a tragic situation.

FEMA, the State of Texas, local jurisdictions and chapters of the Red Cross and other relief organizations are breaking their backs with little to no sleep with television cameras and microphones shoved down their throats waiting to capture and glorify any mistake or misstep, but you decided it was just “great” to get “free food.”

Again, congratulations, Jacki. You’ve joined a distinguished group of individuals who have used and abused an already stressed public service for your own selfish behavior. You’ve got some great company, too. There are the folks who took their Katrina disaster assistance funds to buy a set of ‘Girls Gone Wild’ videos and others who took the Hawaiian vacation. And let’s not forget the person who went for some truly ‘life altering surgery’ (and I’m not talking about heart bypass surgery either).

Jacki, as you enjoy your time off, I hope you’ll be available at some future date to join all of the Federal, State and Local officials who will find themselves dragged before Congressional Committees and television cameras. I sincerely hope you’ll get a seat between FEMA’s Logistics Team and the Red Cross Shelter Directors who will be mocked and pummeled by angry Congressional Members (and followed out the door by throngs of investigative reporters) for trying to do their jobs in the midst of a disaster while needs, demands and exhaustion were rising exponentially. I’m hoping you’ll bring a list of your favorite MREs meals to share as well.

There have always been ‘Jackies’ who have taken advantage of these situations for their own selfish benefit. Sometimes these people are caught and prosecuted for fraud and other abuses, but the majority just get away with it. That’s the real crime of this situation but in spite of the selfish idiocy of individuals like Jacki ,there is still a job to do and we should all be grateful it’s still being done.

I guess we should also be grateful that Jacki has taught the rest of us what type of individual we don’t want our fellow citizens, and most especially our children, to be. As a teacher, she’s also given us a teachable moment for what the entire emergency response, logistics and recovery teams have to be wary of: while they serve people who really need help — they have Jacki and her kind standing in line for their share too.

There has to be a word for people like this…

How about ‘Jackies’?

Homeland Security 3.0

Friday, September 19th, 2008

Yesterday, in an event at the National Press Club, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), along with the Heritage Foundation, released Homeland Security 3.0: Building a National Enterprise to Keep America Safe, Free and Prosperous. This report, the third of its kind, presents 25 recommendations aimed at improving homeland security across the board. Specifically, my co-author David Heyman and I emphasize why we need to treat domestic and international security concerns in a more holistic manner within the National Security Council. The event was keynoted by CSIS President John J. Hamre, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense.

Listen to Grover and Rosita

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

Yesterday DHS’ Ready Program announced a new partnership with Sesame Street as part of its Ready Kids Campaign. By speaking to the youngest among us, the partnership is working to help families understand the steps to take and the resources they should have to be prepared for an emergency.

I think it’s safe to say that the late-night comedians, media pundits and preparedness critics will have a field day making jokes about this relationship; but to anyone who has young kids, you just found yourself two friends, Grover and Rosita who will help you and your family take the steps to a safer future.

The printed materials, as well as on-line video featuring Grover and Rosita, speak to the child as much as they do the adult about what they need to know and what they need to do to be ‘ready.’ After examining the impacts of previous disasters such as the 9/11 attacks, the 2005 Hurricanes and other emergencies around the country, the need to look after the physical, emotional and psychological wellbeing of victims has garnered more and much deserved attention. While an emergency can occur at any time and take any form, helping to educate a child with essential information (knowing their full name, address, phone number, parents name, etc) can make a world of difference.

The Ready Team could not have asked for a better partner than the team behind Sesame Street. Imagination and education have always come together on Sesame Street and if we are going to forge a culture of preparedness, this is a great place to start.

Children have an amazing way of pushing us to do many things – from encouraging us to recycle the newspapers and cans at home to telling us to wash our hands before a ‘snack’ or a meal and turn off the water from a running sink. The simple suggestions that Sesame Street has taught generations of kids is evident in thousands of adults and children and the small behaviors and good habits they learned through the program. Many times, these lessons can spur even an adult to do the ‘right thing’ especially when they are questioned (or even challenged) by a child who is a Sesame Street watcher. Such lessons can make all the difference in the world and they can also have the biggest personal payoff when least expected. Imagine the look on a parent’s face when their child asks them about being ‘ready for an emergency.’

The press release announcing the partnership cited a “recent national survey commissioned by the Children’s Health Fund, approximately 65 percent of families in the United States do not have an emergency plan that all family members are aware of. And there’s another problem: Spanish-language resources aimed at helping families with emergency preparedness are sorely lacking.”

That statistic is staggering, especially in light of the destruction we have watched occur over the past two weeks with Hurricanes Gustav, Hanna and Ike. While many of us can shake our heads questioning the judgment (and sanity) of people who did not evacuate from the immediate path of Hurricane Ike, the fact that children are being talked to about what they should do with their families in event of an emergency could do a lot to get more families engaged with preparedness.

For years, schools of all types have taken part in the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) ‘Learn Not to Burn Campaign’ which has taught kids what to do in the event of a fire. From coming home with the worksheet to plan an exit from the home and defining a gathering point for the family, to learning to simply ‘Stop, Drop and Roll,’ this campaign has saved countless lives. All of this education has occurred in a ‘positive, non-threatening manner’ and it has made a difference.

The same holds true for what the Ready Team and Sesame Street are offering our kids.

When a child questions a parent about a ‘right or wrong,’ often times the parent is put in the position of having to explain something very difficult and confusing, if not outright uncomfortable. Regardless of whatever the question may be, the child deserves an answer.

When that same child asks a question such as “What do we do in case of an emergency,’ the parent is going to be put in the position of explaining. That is a question that absolutely deserves a thorough answer and ignoring it is not an option in my book. Unfortunately the survey results cited by the Children’s Health Fund indicate that too many parents don’t have an answer to what is a basic and potentially life altering question. That has to change.

If a child asking a parent that question spurs the family take action – all the better. That’s the point of this partnership. Having allies like Sesame Street’s Grover and Rosita to ‘coach’ the youngest of us along the way (and spur parents to action) may make all the difference to moving that 65% unprepared family figure to a more positive number and a more prepared nation.

Congratulations to the Ready Team and Sesame Street on a great partnership!

Bush: “We Are At War with Extremists”

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

The Associated Press: Bush: ‘We are at war with extremists’

President Bush said Wednesday that the attack on the U.S. embassy in the capital of Yemen was a reminder that the United States remains “at war” with ideological extremists.

Attackers armed with automatic weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and at least one suicide car bomb assaulted the U.S. embassy. Sixteen people were killed, including six assailants, officials said.

So, What’s the Plan?

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

The constant threat of another terrorist attack, organizing the more than 87,000 governmental organizations who share the responsibility of homeland security, and facing the upcoming questions regarding FEMA, the Patriot Act, and border security are among the issues facing the next President. So, what’s the homeland security plan? This question, raised by a recent blog post from homelandsecuritywatch.com, points to an article I co-wrote with David Heyman of CSIS that asks the same question.

The American people have not heard very much from the Presidential candidates regarding their plans for homeland security. We offer 5 recommendations for the candidates to consider including: expanding international cooperation, building strong infrastructure, promoting community self-reliance, clarify domestic intelligence, and improve security on all levels of government. The pressing issues outlined in both articles weigh heavily on the minds of many Americans, and it’s time we heard the candidates’ solutions.

Thanks and Respect to FEMA in the Worst of Conditions

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

Every natural disaster has its problems and Hurricane Ike is no different.  While this response was unimaginably better than that to Katrina, we are now starting to see more and more stories coming out about logistical challenges and shortages in getting commodities into the areas impacted by Hurricane Ike.  I’m sure there are shortages and gaps – there always are in a response – but I also have no doubt another part of this story is the media/public official ‘piling on’ FEMA for whatever the issue de jour might be.

This type of reaction is almost Pavlovian in a way.

It goes like this – The disaster occurs; local and state partners call upon FEMA and others to assist; the response ramps up and materials start to come into the affected areas but it’s not perfect and there are not enough items for everyone who needs something so the de facto behavior is find a reporter and a microphone and ‘trash FEMA.’

It’s always easy to find a reporter who will record the fact that some people did not get the water, ice or MREs they needed while hundreds if not thousands of others did.  While there have been a few news stories about those that have received emergency supplies, I’d still like to see some more coverage about how essential supplies are getting to folks (regardless of them having to stand in line to get it).  Unfortunately successes don’t make much news coverage. We truly live in a media centric world immortalized by the classic Don Henley song, ‘Dirty Laundry.’

“Kick em when they’re up
Kick em when they’re down
Kick em when they’re up
Kick em all around.”

As much as I have been a critic of how Logistics has been run at FEMA, I really feel for these people. Their job is thankless.  Regardless of how much they do it will never be enough.  It will always be too little or too late.  It will also be resoundingly criticized.  To take the job that Eric Smith (FEMA’s Logistics leader) and his team have, you have to have the patience of a saint and skin made of Kevlar because there will always be someone taking a shot at you while someone else is chewing on your arm and leg for something else.

The Mayor of Houston and several other elected officials have already started in on FEMA’s Logistics operations and I have no doubt others will join them.  Criticism such as what the Mayor and other officials have offered may be absolutely warranted and justified, but I offer the following words of caution.  As the leaders of their communities it is their responsibility to raise their voices to let FEMA and others know what they need, but how their criticism is offered and relayed can say an awful lot.

I would hope these leaders and others would take a deep breath first, convey their thanks and appreciation for the efforts that are being expended and then share what their needs might be.  When delivered, their tone should be respectful and mindful of the tireless and round the clock efforts that are underway to support their affected communities.

Several of these leaders have exemplified that type of patient and respectful behavior and they continue to operate in such a dignified manner; but with the disaster almost a week old, the traditional ‘Pavlovian’ finger-pointing behavior and chorus of ‘trash FEMA’ seems about to begin.

As someone who has had the fortune of working with some of these good people during disasters and other ‘events,’ I’d like to say to those officials and other arm-chair critics – ‘Just cool it.’  [There are other things I would like to say but I will follow my own advice to ‘cool it.']

Trashing people, FEMA or DHS does no one any good in the given environment. It only makes things harder.  There is enough anxiety and pressure to go around – pouring fury on it proves nothing.

Does this mean we should refrain from declaring needs and criticism in the midst of what is happening on the Gulf Coast?  Absolutely not, but the tone and delivery of how those needs and criticism are declared should be kept in mind.

While name calling and hysterics by public officials make for lots of media coverage (especially TV – see New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin & Katrina in 2005) they do zilch to make the actual situation any better.

I’m sure in the weeks to come there will be lessons learned and Congressional and media ‘inquests’ that will review what worked and what didn’t with our nation’s Hurricane Ike response.  That’s the way it should be; but for right now, I just have to say God bless Eric Smith, his Logistics team and every other person who is down there from FEMA and the State, Local and private sector response teams trying to make the best happen in the most challenging of circumstances.

My words of support for FEMA and its Logistics team does not mean I am backing off on my earlier criticisms of the need to better engage industry in the entire Logistics operation (as well as other components of disaster response and recovery) but I think if there is anyone who could use a handshake and a pat on the back to ‘keep it up’ it is Eric Smith and his Logistics team.  They are doing everything they can to make life better for people in need and that is a whole lot more than many critics have ever done.

We are fortunate to have Eric, his team and everyone down there serving our nation.  They are not perfect – nor are the rest of us but they are doing a ‘thankless job’ in the most difficult of circumstances and they deserve our appreciation.  They certainly deserve our respect and they’ve earned that in spades.

Breaking News: Islamic Militants Attack US embassy in Yemen

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

16 dead in US embassy attack in Yemen – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Islamist militants have attacked the US embassy in the Yemeni capital Sanaa with a car bomb and rockets, causing “multiple casualties,” an embassy spokesman said.

Sixteen people, including six soldiers, six militants and four bystanders, were killed in the twin car bombing, the interior ministry said.

Hurricane-Force Irresponsibility II

Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

Our hearts go out to the families dislocated by the destruction wrought by Hurricane Ike. Going back now, however, isn’t the answer. The mayor of Galveston is literally begging residents to stay away, noting that the city cannot possibly provide a safe environment and is nearing a health crisis. Folks returning are only adding to that crisis.

From a USA Today reporter on the scene:

The city can produce only a tiny amount of clean drinking water, there is minimal electricity, standing water will soon breed hordes of mosquitos and the University of Texas Medical Branch – the island’s main medical center -is unable to care for seriously injured people.

Hurricane-Force Irresponsibility

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

Despite the destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, where many residents refused to heed common sense and evacuate and faced one of the worst U.S. natural disasters of recent history, there were a shocking number of residents in Galveston, in the thousands, who elected stay behind as well and watch the storm roll in this weekend — despite urgent warnings from all government levels to evacuate.

Pictures tell the story of how this predictably worked out … from Galveston residents walking along the sea wall watching massive waves begin to crest and clowning for pictures …

Clowning for Ike

Clowning for Ike

… To, eventually, the post-hurricane video of death and destruction. The clip below on FOX News says it all, the camera panning a sea of crushed plywood and brick that had days before been homes and places of business:

A Hurricane Ike Time-Out on Immigration Enforcement – The Right Choice

Friday, September 12th, 2008

Following recent months of aggressive immigration enforcement by DHS, it may surprise some that it would announce a time-out in immigration enforcement. Yet, DHS properly did that when it announced today that it would cease enforcement operations in the Texas regions that are implementing mandatory evacuations in anticipation of Hurricane Ike’s arrival. In logically exercising its law enforcement discretion, DHS announced that there would be “no DHS immigration enforcement operations associated with evacuations and sheltering.” And this makes sense.

Law enforcement operations should ceded priority to evacuation efforts aimed at saving lives, as is the case with the instant mandatory evacuation orders. Rumors and fears had spread through the undocumented communities in these impacted areas that they could be subject to arrest by immigration agents and the border patrol while boarding buses and evacuating from the region. There were newspaper and community organization reports that people were remaining in the area and eschewing calls and offers of support from the state and local governments to evacuate the region immediately. Facing a potential situation of large populations of undocumented immigrants remaining in the path of a potentially devastating Category 3 hurricane and its ensuing flooding, DHS had to respond and take action to eliminate this potentially deadly scenario.

Kudos to DHS for making clear to the public, through both an English and a Spanish announcement, that undocumented immigrants in the impacted regions should put these fears aside and immediately evacuate from the region. In this instance, a time-out on immigration operations is the right thing to do.

©2008 Adfero Group. All Rights Reserved.